Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 20;4(1):5-27.
doi: 10.1515/almed-2023-0003. eCollection 2023 Apr.

Handling of lipemic samples in the clinical laboratory

[Article in English, Spanish]
Affiliations

Handling of lipemic samples in the clinical laboratory

[Article in English, Spanish]
Carla Fernández Prendes et al. Adv Lab Med. .

Abstract

Interferences in the clinical laboratory may lead physicians misinterpret results for some biological analytes. The most common analytical interferences in the clinical laboratory include hemolysis, icterus and lipemia. Lipemia is defined as turbidity in a sample caused by the accumulation of lipoproteins, mainly very-low density lipoproteins (VLDL) and chylomicrons. Several methods are available for the detection of lipemic samples, including the lipemic index, or triglyceride quantification in serum or plasma samples, or mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCHC) concentration in blood samples. According to the European Directive 98/79/CE, it is the responsibility of clinical laboratories to monitor the presence of interfering substances that may affect the measurement of an analyte. There is an urgent need to standardize interference studies and the way interferences are reported by manufacturers. Several methods are currently available to remove interference from lipemia and enable accurate measurement of biological quantities. The clinical laboratory should establish a protocol for the handling of lipemic samples according to the biological quantity to be tested.

Keywords: interference; intralipid; lipemia; lipemia index; serum indices.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Flowchart for the detection and treatment of lipemic serum/plasma detection in the analysis of biological analytes.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Flow chart for the detection and treatment of lipemic citrate plasma samples for the analysis of hemostatic analytes. *Method available in some hemostasis analyzers.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Flow chart for the detection and treatment of lipemic EDTA whole blood samples for the analysis of CBC analytes. CBC, complete blood count; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; MCH, mean corpuscular hemoglobin; Hb, hemoglobin. *The abnormal graph is specific of each hematology analyzer. **Only available in some hematology analyzers.

References

    1. Mainali S, Davis SR, Krasowski MD. Frequency and causes of lipemia interference of clinical chemistry laboratory tests. Pract Lab Med. 2017;8:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2017.02.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nikolac N. Lipemia: causes, interference mechanisms, detection and management. Biochem Med. 2014;24:57–67. doi: 10.11613/bm.2014.008. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kroll M. Evaluating interference caused by lipemia. Clin Chem. 2004;50:1968–9. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2004.038075. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Soleimani N, Mohammadzadeh S, Asadian F. Lipemia interferences in biochemical tests, investigating the efficacy of different removal methods in comparison with ultracentrifugation as the gold standard. J Anal Methods Chem. 2020;2020 doi: 10.1155/2020/9857636. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nordestgaard BG, Langsted A, Mora S, Kolovou G, Baum H, Bruckert E, et al. Fasting is not routinely required for determination of a lipid profile: clinical and laboratory implications including flagging at desirable concentration cutpoints-a joint consensus statement from the European atherosclerosis society and European federation of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine. Clin Chem. 2016;62:930–46. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2016.258897. - DOI - PubMed