Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2023 Mar 11;9(6):363-366.
doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2023.03.001. eCollection 2023 Jun.

A case of leadless-to-leadless pacemaker interaction

Affiliations
Case Reports

A case of leadless-to-leadless pacemaker interaction

Marissa Frazer et al. HeartRhythm Case Rep. .
No abstract available

Keywords: Device-to-device interaction; Leadless pacemaker; Leadless pacemaker retrieval; Pacemaker complication; Pacemaker noise.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Electrocardiogram taken on readmission demonstrating sinus rhythm with intermittent high grade atrioventricular block with a ventricular escape and the presence of pacing spikes that are not followed by QRS complexes, consistent with ventricular noncapture (asterisk). Intermittent loss of atrial tracking is also observed (arrows).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Original Micra (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, MN) device (1) and replacement Micra (2). A: Right anterior oblique fluoroscopic view demonstrating the proximity of the original and replacement Micra devices. B: Adjacent device positioning demonstrated in a left anterior oblique fluoroscopic view. C: Fluoroscopic image depicting the successful snaring of the retrieval knob on the original Micra device using a 25mm Gooseneck snare, Mach-1 multipurpose catheter, and medium-curve Agilis sheath.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A comparable interference pattern (asterisk) on intracardiac electrogram obtained from a similar case (as tracings from this case could not be retrieved). Note the V paced events with sharp deflections consistently ∼200 ms following QRS complexes and 2 nonphysiologic V oversensing events at the beginning of the tracing from device–device interference.

References

    1. Meredith A., Naaraayan A., Nimkar A., Acharya P., Aziz E.F. The rise of leadless pacemaker utilization in United States. Am J Cardiol. 2021;154:127–128. - PubMed
    1. Reynolds D., Duray G.Z., Omar R., et al. Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study Group A leadless intracardiac transcatheter pacing system. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:533–541. - PubMed
    1. Duray G.Z., Ritter P., El-Chami M., et al. Long-term performance of a transcatheter pacing system: 12-month results from the Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:702–709. - PubMed
    1. El-Chami M.F., Al-Samadi F., Clementy N., et al. Updated performance of the Micra transcatheter pacemaker in the real-world setting: a comparison to the investigational study and a transvenous historical control. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15:1800–1807. - PubMed
    1. El-Chami M.F., Bockstedt L., Longacre C., et al. Leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacing in the Micra CED study: 2-year follow-up. Eur Heart J. 2021;43:1207–1215. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources