Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 30;3(4):365-372.
doi: 10.1016/j.jointm.2023.02.001. Online ahead of print.

Efficacy and safety of awake prone positioning in the treatment of non-intubated spontaneously breathing patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Jingjing Wang  1 , Daonan Chen  1 , Puyu Deng  1 , Chenchen Zhang  1 , Xue Zhan  1 , Hui Lv  1 , Hui Xie  1 , Dechang Chen  2 , Ruilan Wang  1
Affiliations

Efficacy and safety of awake prone positioning in the treatment of non-intubated spontaneously breathing patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Jingjing Wang et al. J Intensive Med. .

Abstract

Background: Since the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, prone positioning has been widely applied for non-intubated, spontaneously breathing patients. However, the efficacy and safety of prone positioning in non-intubated patients with COVID-19-related acute hypoxemic respiratory failure remain unclear. We aimed to systematically analyze the outcomes associated with awake prone positioning (APP).

Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science from January 1, 2020, to June 3, 2022. This study included adult patients with acute respiratory failure caused by COVID-19. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed, and the study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The primary outcome was the reported cumulative intubation risk across randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and the effect estimates were calculated as risk ratios (RRs; 95% confidence interval [CI]).

Results: A total of 495 studies were identified, of which 10 fulfilled the selection criteria, and 2294 patients were included. In comparison to supine positioning, APP significantly reduced the need for intubation in the overall population (RR=0.84, 95% CI: 0.74-0.95). The two groups showed no significant differences in the incidence of adverse events (RR=1.16, 95% CI: 0.48-2.76). The meta-analysis revealed no difference in mortality between the groups (RR=0.93, 95% CI: 0.77-1.11).

Conclusions: APP was safe and reduced the need for intubation in patients with respiratory failure associated with COVID-19. However, it did not significantly reduce mortality in comparison to usual care without prone positioning.

Keywords: Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure; Awake prone positioning; COVID-19; Non-invasive respiratory support.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of study selection. RCT: Randomized controlled trial.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Association of APP with intubation. APP: Awake prone positioning; CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Subgroup analysis of intubation. CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Association of APP with intubation mortality. APP: Awake prone positioning; CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Subgroup analysis of intubation mortality. CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Adverse events. CI: Confidence interval.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Guérin C., Reignier J., Richard J.C., Beuret P., Gacouin A., Boulain T., et al. Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(23):2159–2168. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214103. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mancebo J., Fernández R., Blanch L., Rialp G., Gordo F., Ferrer M., et al. A multicenter trial of prolonged prone ventilation in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;173(11):1233–1239. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200503-353OC. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Coopersmith C.M., Antonelli M., Bauer S.R., Deutschman C.S., Evans L.E., Ferrer R., et al. The surviving sepsis campaign: research priorities for coronavirus disease 2019 in critical illness. Crit Care Med. 2021;49(4):598–622. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004895. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vitacca M., Nava S., Santus P., Harari S. Early consensus management for non-ICU acute respiratory failure SARS-CoV-2 emergency in Italy: from ward to trenches. Eur Respir J. 2020;55(5) doi: 10.1183/13993003.00632-2020. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grieco D.L., Maggiore S.M., Roca O., Spinelli E., Patel B.K., Thille A.W., et al. Non-invasive ventilatory support and high-flow nasal oxygen as first-line treatment of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and ARDS. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(8):851–866. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06459-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed