Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 12;43(28):5241-5250.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2330-22.2023. Epub 2023 Jun 26.

Is Short Sleep Bad for the Brain? Brain Structure and Cognitive Function in Short Sleepers

Affiliations

Is Short Sleep Bad for the Brain? Brain Structure and Cognitive Function in Short Sleepers

Anders M Fjell et al. J Neurosci. .

Abstract

Many sleep less than recommended without experiencing daytime sleepiness. According to prevailing views, short sleep increases risk of lower brain health and cognitive function. Chronic mild sleep deprivation could cause undetected sleep debt, negatively affecting cognitive function and brain health. However, it is possible that some have less sleep need and are more resistant to negative effects of sleep loss. We investigated this using a cross-sectional and longitudinal sample of 47,029 participants of both sexes (20-89 years) from the Lifebrain consortium, Human Connectome project (HCP) and UK Biobank (UKB), with measures of self-reported sleep, including 51,295 MRIs of the brain and cognitive tests. A total of 740 participants who reported to sleep <6 h did not experience daytime sleepiness or sleep problems/disturbances interfering with falling or staying asleep. These short sleepers showed significantly larger regional brain volumes than both short sleepers with daytime sleepiness and sleep problems (n = 1742) and participants sleeping the recommended 7-8 h (n = 3886). However, both groups of short sleepers showed slightly lower general cognitive function (GCA), 0.16 and 0.19 SDs, respectively. Analyses using accelerometer-estimated sleep duration confirmed the findings, and the associations remained after controlling for body mass index, depression symptoms, income, and education. The results suggest that some people can cope with less sleep without obvious negative associations with brain morphometry and that sleepiness and sleep problems may be more related to brain structural differences than duration. However, the slightly lower performance on tests of general cognitive abilities warrants closer examination in natural settings.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Short habitual sleep is prevalent, with unknown consequences for brain health and cognitive performance. Here, we show that daytime sleepiness and sleep problems are more strongly related to regional brain volumes than sleep duration. However, participants sleeping ≤6 h had slightly lower scores on tests of general cognitive function (GCA). This indicates that sleep need is individual and that sleep duration per se is very weakly if at all related brain health, while daytime sleepiness and sleep problems may show somewhat stronger associations. The association between habitual short sleep and lower scores on tests of general cognitive abilities must be further scrutinized in natural settings.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01634841.

Keywords: MRI; brain; cognition; hippocampus; sleep; sleepiness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Percent differences in brain volumes between groups. Graphical presentation of the numeric results of Tables 5 (left panel) and 6 (right panel). Left panel, Comparisons between “group 1: Short sleep and no sleep problems/sleepiness” and “group 2: Short sleep and sleep problems/sleepiness,” using group 1 as reference (estimate = 0, vertical line). Dots to the left represent smaller volumes of group 2. Lines are sorted from lowest to highest right CI limit. Middle panel, The same comparison as in the left panel, but group classification is based on agreement between self-reports and accelerometer. Lower CIs are trunctade at −4%. Right panel, Comparisons between “group 3: Recommended sleep and no sleep problems/sleepiness” and “group 4: Recommended sleep and sleep problems/sleepiness,” using group 3 as reference (estimate = 0, dashed line). Dots to the left represent smaller volumes of group 4. Error bars represent 95% CI.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Controlling for additional covariates. Regional brain volumes compared while controlling for additional covariates “group 2: Short sleep and sleep problems/sleepiness” compared with “group 1: Short sleep and no sleep problems/sleepiness.” Error bars represent 95%CI.

References

    1. Adamantidis A, Fort P, Luppi PH (2021) The neurophysiology of wakefulness and non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep. In: Sleep medicine textbook (Bassetti C, McNicholas W, Paunio T, and Peigneux P, eds), Edition 2. Regensburg: European Sleep Research Society.
    1. Alfaro-Almagro F, et al. (2018) Image processing and quality control for the first 10,000 brain imaging datasets from UK Biobank. Neuroimage 166:400–424. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.034 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baddeley A, Emslie H, Nimmo-smith I (1993) The spot-the-word test - a robust estimate of verbal intelligence based on lexical decision. Br J Clin Psychol 32:55–65. 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1993.tb01027.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bertram L, Böckenhoff A, Demuth I, Düzel S, Eckardt R, Li SC, Lindenberger U, Pawelec G, Siedler T, Wagner GG, Steinhagen-Thiessen E (2014) Cohort profile: the Berlin Aging Study II (BASE-II). Int J Epidemiol 43:703–712. 10.1093/ije/dyt018 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ (1989) The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res 28:193–213. 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data