Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep;49(9):2095-2102.
doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2023.05.016. Epub 2023 Jun 24.

Machine Learning Algorithm Detection of Confluent B-Lines

Affiliations

Machine Learning Algorithm Detection of Confluent B-Lines

Cristiana Baloescu et al. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2023 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: B-lines are a ring-down artifact of lung ultrasound that arise with increased alveolar water in conditions such as pulmonary edema and infectious pneumonitis. Confluent B-line presence may signify a different level of pathology compared with single B-lines. Existing algorithms aimed at B-line counting do not distinguish between single and confluent B-lines. The objective of this study was to test a machine learning algorithm for confluent B-line identification.

Methods: This study used a subset of 416 clips from 157 subjects, previously acquired in a prospective study enrolling adults with shortness of breath at two academic medical centers, using a hand-held tablet and a 14-zone protocol. After exclusions, random sampling generated a total of 416 clips (146 curvilinear, 150 sector and 120 linear) for review. A group of five experts in point-of-care ultrasound blindly evaluated the clips for presence/absence of confluent B-lines. Ground truth was defined as majority agreement among the experts and used for comparison with the algorithm.

Results: Confluent B-lines were present in 206 of 416 clips (49.5%). Sensitivity and specificity of confluent B-line detection by algorithm compared with expert determination were 83% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77-0.88) and 92% (95% CI: 0.88-0.96). Sensitivity and specificity did not statistically differ between transducers. Agreement between algorithm and expert for confluent B-lines measured by unweighted κ was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.69-0.81) for the overall set.

Conclusion: The confluent B-line detection algorithm had high sensitivity and specificity for detection of confluent B-lines in lung ultrasound point-of-care clips, compared with expert determination.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence; B-line; Lung ultrasound; Machine learning; Point-of-care ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest A.A.R., A.C., M.Z., G.G., J.W., R.C. and B.R. are employees of Philips Healthcare. The remaining authors report funding to their institutions and/or effort support from Philips Healthcare via funding from BARDA.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources