Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 May 26;8(2):73.
doi: 10.3390/jfmk8020073.

Exercise Prescription for the Work-Life Population and Beyond

Affiliations
Review

Exercise Prescription for the Work-Life Population and Beyond

Gisela Sjøgaard et al. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. .

Abstract

The background for this paper concerns a high frequency of work-related disorders that may result from physical exposure at work being highly sedentary, repetitive-monotonous, or physically demanding. This may result in levels of physical inactivity or strenuous activity impairing health. The aim is to present an evidence-based exercise prescription for the work-life population and beyond. The exercise program is designed to be feasible for use at the workplace and/or during leisure time and to improve health, workability, productivity, sickness absence, etc. The specific concept of Intelligent Physical Exercise Training, IPET, includes the assessment of several health-related variables, including musculoskeletal disorders, physical capacity, and physical exposure at work and/or daily life activity. An algorithm with cut-points for prescribing specific exercises is provided. Exercise programs in praxis are addressed through descriptions of precise executions of various prescribed exercises and possible alternatives to optimize variation and adherence. Finally, perspectives on the significance of introducing IPET and the ongoing, as well as future lines of development, are discussed.

Keywords: cardiovascular fitness; exercise interventions; musculoskeletal disorders; musculoskeletal pain; physical capacity; physical exercise training; resistance training; strength training; workplace health promotion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The daily profile of physical activity (PA) consists of three domains of work, leisure time, and sleep alongside with their subdivisions, each with its positive or negative contributions to health and physical capacity [6]. Reproduced with permission from Exercise Sport Sci Rev.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Vicious and virtuous circle model presents the importance of the individual’s capacity for the relation between a designated work task and its load imposed on the body. The relative load of the workdays may, in a longer term, cause either an increase or decrease in individual capacity, thereby initiating a vicious or a virtuous circle. Adapted from [7].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Overview of screening recommendations, training categories, and their effects. HIIT: High intensity interval training. RFD: Rate of Force Development. Adapted from [8].
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cartoon of the conceptual model of IPET. The IPET concept is based on 50 min effective intelligent exercise training each week, excluding warm-up time for around 10 min. Twenty minutes is allocated to the individual’s work profile, and 30 min is allocated to target the individual’s physical capacity and health profile. In addition to the 50 min IPET, warm-up exercises are recommended to increase the body’s temperature and to start the circulation, so that the blood supply increases to the working muscles. The intensity is light, up to 60% of maximum heart rate, corresponding to 9–13 on the 6–20 Borg scale.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Overview of aerobic training intensities measured objectively as heart rate reserve capacity (%HRR) and/or using the corresponding subjective perception. The rate of perceived exertion (RPE) can be evaluated from the 6–20-point Borg scale (C) or the reconstructed 0–10-point Borg scale (C-R). Adapted from [7].

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abdin S., Welch R.K., Byron-Daniel J., Meyrick J. The effectiveness of physical activity interventions in improving well-being across office-based workplace settings: A systematic review. Public Health. 2018;160:70–76. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2018.03.029. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pedersen B.K., Andersen L.B. Fysisk Aktivitet—Håndbog om Forebyggelse. Sundhedsstyrelsen; København, Denmark: 2018.
    1. Fimland M.S., Vie G., Holtermann A., Krokstad S., Nilsen T.I.L. Occupational and leisure-time physical activity and risk of disability pension: Prospective data from the HUNT Study, Norway. Occup. Environ. Med. 2018;75:23–28. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2017-104320. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Holtermann A., Marott J.L., Gyntelberg F., Sogaard K., Suadicani P., Mortensen O.S., Prescott E., Schnohr P. Does the benefit on survival from leisure time physical activity depend on physical activity at work? A prospective cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e54548. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054548. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lavin K.M., Coen P.M., Baptista L.C., Bell M.B., Drummer D., Harper S.A., Lixandrao M.E., McAdam J.S., O’Bryan S.M., Ramos S., et al. State of Knowledge on Molecular Adaptations to Exercise in Humans: Historical Perspectives and Future Directions. Compr. Physiol. 2022;12:3193–3279. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c200033. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources