In the quest for histone deacetylase inhibitors: current trends in the application of multilayered computational methods
- PMID: 37367966
- DOI: 10.1007/s00726-023-03297-y
In the quest for histone deacetylase inhibitors: current trends in the application of multilayered computational methods
Abstract
Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors have gained attention over the past three decades because of their potential in the treatment of different diseases including various forms of cancers, neurodegenerative disorders, autoimmune, inflammatory diseases, and other metabolic disorders. To date, 5 HDAC inhibitor drugs are marketed for the treatment of hematological malignancies and several drug-candidate HDAC inhibitors are at different stages of clinical trials. However, due to the toxic side effects of these drugs resulting from the lack of target selectivity, active studies are ongoing to design and develop either class-selective or isoform-selective inhibitors. Computational methods have aided the discovery of HDAC inhibitors with the desired potency and/or selectivity. These methods include ligand-based approaches such as scaffold hopping, pharmacophore modeling, three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationships (3D-QSAR); and structure-based virtual screening (molecular docking). The current trends involve the application of the combination of these methods and incorporating molecular dynamics simulations coupled with Poisson-Boltzmann/molecular mechanics generalized Born surface area (MM-PBSA/MM-GBSA) to improve the prediction of ligand binding affinity. This review aimed at understanding the current trends in applying these multilayered strategies and their contribution to the design/identification of HDAC inhibitors.
Keywords: HDAC inhibitors; Ligand-based and structure-based methods; MD simulation; MM-PBSA/MM-GBSA; Selectivity.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- AbdElmoniem N, H. Abdallah M, M. Mukhtar R, Moutasim F, Rafie Ahmed A, Edris A, Ibraheem W, Makki AA, M. Elshamly E, Elhag R, Osman W, A. Mothana R, Alzain AA (2023) Identification of Novel Natural Dual HDAC and Hsp90 Inhibitors for Metastatic TNBC Using e-Pharmacophore Modeling, Molecular Docking, and Molecular Dynamics Studies. Molecules 28 (4). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28041771
-
- Abdizadeh T, Ghodsi R, Hadizadeh F (2017) 3D-QSAR (CoMFA, CoMSIA) and Molecular Docking Studies on Histone Deacetylase 1 Selective Inhibitors. Recent Patents on Anti-Cancer Drug Discovery 12 (4). doi: https://doi.org/10.2174/1574892812666170508125927
-
- Agarwal R, Pattarawat P, Duff MR (2022) Wang H-CR, Baudry J. Smith JC. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.31.494169 - DOI
-
- Aldana-Masangkay GI, Sakamoto KM (2011) The role of HDAC6 in cancer. J Biomed Biotechnol 2011:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/875824 - DOI
-
- Alseksek RK, Ramadan WS, Saleh E, El-Awady R (2022) The role of HDACs in the response of cancer cells to cellular stress and the potential for therapeutic intervention. Int J Mol Sci 23(15). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23158141
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
