Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec;33(12):8669-8681.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09754-2. Epub 2023 Jun 27.

Real-world efficacy and safety of TACE plus camrelizumab and apatinib in patients with HCC (CHANCE2211): a propensity score matching study

Affiliations

Real-world efficacy and safety of TACE plus camrelizumab and apatinib in patients with HCC (CHANCE2211): a propensity score matching study

Zhi-Cheng Jin et al. Eur Radiol. 2023 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus camrelizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting programmed death-1, and apatinib for patients with intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a real-world setting.

Methods: A total of 586 HCC patients treated with either TACE plus camrelizumab and apatinib (combination group, n = 107) or TACE monotherapy (monotherapy group, n = 479) were included retrospectively. Propensity score matching analysis was used to match patients. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety in the combination group were described in comparison to monotherapy.

Results: After propensity score matching (1:2), 84 patients in the combination group were matched to 147 patients in the monotherapy group. The median age was 57 years and 71/84 (84.5%) patients were male in the combination group, while the median age was 57 years with 127/147 (86.4%) male in the monotherapy group. The median OS, PFS, and ORR in the combination group were significantly higher than those in the monotherapy group (median OS, 24.1 vs. 15.7 months, p = 0.008; median PFS, 13.5 vs. 7.7 months, p = 0.003; ORR, 59.5% [50/84] vs. 37.4% [55/147], p = 0.002). On multivariable Cox regression, combination therapy was associated with significantly better OS (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26-0.64; p < 0.001) and PFS (adjusted HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.37-0.74; p < 0.001). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 14/84 (16.7%) and 12/147 (8.2%) in the combination and monotherapy groups, respectively.

Conclusions: TACE plus camrelizumab and apatinib showed significantly better OS, PFS, and ORR versus TACE monotherapy for predominantly advanced HCC.

Clinical relevance statement: Compared with TACE monotherapy, TACE plus immunotherapy and molecular targeted therapy showed better clinical efficacy for predominantly advanced HCC patients, with a higher incidence of adverse events.

Key points: • This propensity score-matched study demonstrates that TACE plus immunotherapy and molecular targeted therapy have a longer OS, PFS, and ORR compared with TACE monotherapy in HCC. • Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 14/84 (16.7%) patients treated with TACE plus immunotherapy and molecular targeted therapy compared with 12/147 (8.2%) patients in the monotherapy group, while no grade 5 adverse events were observed in all cohorts.

Keywords: Carcinoma, hepatocellular; Chemoembolization, therapeutic; Combined modality therapy; Immunotherapy; Molecular targeted therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient selection flowchart. TACE, transarterial chemoembolization; BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer. #The timeframe criteria of combination therapy were defined as administration of TACE concurrently with or up to 60 days before camrelizumab, and apatinib was concomitant with TACE or camrelizumab
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan–Meier curves of progression-free survival (A) and overall survival (B) after matching
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Subgroup analysis of progression-free survival (A) and overall survival (B) after matching. HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; TACE, transarterial chemoembolization; cTACE, conventional transarterial chemoembolization; DEB-TACE, drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
A 72-year-old man had a history of chronic hepatitis B for more than twenty years. The baseline MRI showed that there is a typical HCC lesion (red asterisk) in the right liver lobe with intrahepatic metastasis. The enlargement of the porta hepatic lymph node (white arrow) was considered an extrahepatic spread malignancy. Then, the patient received TACE combined with camrelizumab (200 mg, ivgtt, Q3w) and apatinib (250 mg, po, QD). The first, three-month, 1-year follow-up imaging after combination therapy showed a partial response. MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; CT, computed tomography; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; TACE, transarterial chemoembolization

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL et al (2021) Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71:209–249 - PubMed
    1. Villanueva A. Hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:1450–1462. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1713263. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Llovet JM, Kelley RK, Villanueva A et al (2021) Hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers 7:6 - PubMed
    1. Park JW, Chen M, Colombo M, et al. Global patterns of hepatocellular carcinoma management from diagnosis to death: the BRIDGE Study. Liver Int. 2015;35:2155–2166. doi: 10.1111/liv.12818. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lencioni R, Llovet JM, Han G, et al. Sorafenib or placebo plus TACE with doxorubicin-eluting beads for intermediate stage HCC: the SPACE trial. J Hepatol. 2016;64:1090–1098. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.01.012. - DOI - PubMed