Considerations in the use of concurrent or predictive validity in clinical measurement

Affiliations

¹ Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
² School of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Sciences, Central Queensland University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
³ College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.

Editorial

Mousa Alavi et al. Nurs Health Sci. 2023 Jun.

. 2023 Jun;25(2):183-186.

doi: 10.1111/nhs.13030.

¹ Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
² School of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Sciences, Central Queensland University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
³ College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.

No abstract available

Keywords: concurrent validity; criterion validity; measurement; predictive validity.

References

1. Andrade, C. (2020). Sample size and its importance in research. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 42(1), 102-103. https://doi.org/10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_504_19
1. Barrett, G. V., Phillips, J. S., & Alexander, R. A. (1981). Concurrent and predictive validity designs: A critical reanalysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.66.1.1
1. Bell, J. F. (2007). Difficulties in evaluating the predictive validity of selection tests. Research Matters. A Cambridge Assessment Publication. https://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/Images/504397-difficulties-in-eva...
1. Bellamy, N. (2015). Principles of clinical outcome assessment. In M. C. Hochberg, A. J. Silman, J. S. Smolen, M. E. Weinblatt, & M. H. Weisman (Eds.), Rheumatology (6th ed., pp. 9-19). Mosby. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-09138-1.00002-4
1. Cowling, A., & Mailer, C. (1998). Managing human resources. Routledge. https://books.google.com/books?id=Z_9kE6Z10kAC