Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 27;18(6):e0287742.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287742. eCollection 2023.

Quality, productivity, and economic implications of exoskeletons for occupational use: A systematic review

Affiliations

Quality, productivity, and economic implications of exoskeletons for occupational use: A systematic review

Daniel E Fournier et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The objective of this systematic review was to synthesize the current state of knowledge on the quality and productivity of workers and their work while wearing exoskeletons, as well as the economic implications of exoskeletons for occupational use. Following the PRISMA guidelines, six databases were systematically searched for relevant journal articles, written in English, and published since January 2000. Articles meeting the inclusion criteria had their quality assessed using JBI's Checklist for Quasi-Experimental Studies (Non-Randomized Experimental Studies). A total of 6,722 articles were identified and 15 articles focusing on the impact of exoskeletons on quality and productivity of exoskeleton users while performing occupational tasks were included in this study. None of the included articles evaluated the economic implications of exoskeletons for occupational use. This study revealed several quality and productivity measures (e.g., endurance time, task completion time, number of errors, number of task cycles completed) used to evaluate the impact of exoskeletons. The current state of the literature suggests that quality and productivity impacts of exoskeleton use are dependent on task characteristics that should be considered when adopting exoskeletons. Future studies should evaluate the impact of exoskeleton use in the field and on a diverse pool of workers, as well as its economic implications to better support decision-making in the adoption of exoskeletons within organizations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. PRISMA flow diagram of literature search and screening process for selected articles.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lowe BD, Billotte WG, Peterson DR. ASTM F48 formation and standards for industrial exoskeletons and exosuits. IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors 2019;7:230–6. doi: 10.1080/24725838.2019.1579769 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Golabchi A, Chao A, Tavakoli M. A systematic review of industrial exoskeletons for injury prevention: efficacy evaluation metrics, target tasks, and supported body postures. Sensors 2022;22. 10.3390/s22072714. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lajeunesse V, Vincent C, Routhier F, Careau E, Michaud F. Exoskeletons’ design and usefulness evidence according to a systematic review of lower limb exoskeletons used for functional mobility by people with spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2016;11:535–47. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2015.1080766 - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Looze MP, Bosch T, Krause F, Stadler KS, O’Sullivan LW. Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load. Ergonomics 2015. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1081988 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bär M, Steinhilber B, Rieger MA, Luger T. The influence of using exoskeletons during occupational tasks on acute physical stress and strain compared to no exoskeleton–a systematic review and meta-analysis. Appl Ergon 2021;94:103385. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103385 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types