Development of a national out-of-hospital transfusion protocol: a modified RAND Delphi study
- PMID: 37369521
- PMCID: PMC10310344
- DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20220151
Development of a national out-of-hospital transfusion protocol: a modified RAND Delphi study
Abstract
Background: Early resuscitation with blood components or products is emerging as best practice in selected patients with trauma and medical patients; as a result, out-of-hospital transfusion (OHT) programs are being developed based on limited and often conflicting evidence. This study aimed to provide guidance to Canadian critical care transport organizations on the development of OHT protocols.
Methods: The study period was July 2021 to June 2022. We used a modified RAND Delphi process to achieve consensus on statements created by the study team guiding various aspects of OHT in the context of critical care transport. Purposive sampling ensured representative distribution of participants in regard to geography and relevant clinical specialties. We conducted 2 written survey Delphi rounds, followed by a virtual panel discussion (round 3). Consensus was defined as a median score of at least 6 on a Likert scale ranging from 1 ("Definitely should not include") to 7 ("Definitely should include"). Statements that did not achieve consensus in the first 2 rounds were discussed and voted on during the panel discussion.
Results: Seventeen subject experts participated in the study, all of whom completed the 3 Delphi rounds. After the study process was completed, a total of 39 statements were agreed on, covering the following domains: general oversight and clinical governance, storage and transport of blood components and products, initiation of OHT, types of blood components and products, delivery and monitoring of OHT, indications for and use of hemostatic adjuncts, and resuscitation targets of OHT.
Interpretation: This expert consensus document provides guidance on OHT best practices. The consensus statements should support efficient and safe OHT in national and international critical care transport programs.
© 2023 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: Brodie Nolan reports research funding from Canadian Blood Services and Physicians’ Services Incorporated Foundation. Andrew Shih reports payments for consulting on educational materials in relation to bleeding management from Octapharma Canada and payments for advisory board participation in relation to clotting factor concentrates from CSL Behring. He has received speaker honoraria from Octapharma Canada and CSL Behring. Octapharma Canada reimbursed travel expenses for attending a meeting for the FARES-II trial comparing clotting factor concentrates to plasma in cardiac surgery. He is vice-chair of the National Advisory Committee on Blood and Blood Products. No other competing interests were declared.
Similar articles
-
Best Practices in Telecritical Care: Expert Consensus Recommendations From the Telecritical Care Collaborative Network.Crit Care Med. 2024 Nov 1;52(11):1750-1767. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006418. Epub 2024 Sep 17. Crit Care Med. 2024. PMID: 39417998
-
Criteria for Critical Care Infants and Children: PICU Admission, Discharge, and Triage Practice Statement and Levels of Care Guidance.Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 Sep;20(9):847-887. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001963. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019. PMID: 31483379
-
A modified Delphi approach to determine current treatment advances for the development of a resuscitation program for maternal cardiac arrest.BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Aug 26;22(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00704-7. BMC Emerg Med. 2022. PMID: 36028819 Free PMC article.
-
Management of adult sepsis in resource-limited settings: global expert consensus statements using a Delphi method.Intensive Care Med. 2025 Jan;51(1):21-38. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07735-7. Epub 2024 Dec 23. Intensive Care Med. 2025. PMID: 39714613 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Speech and language therapy best practice for patients in prolonged disorders of consciousness: a modified Delphi study.Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2019 Sep;54(5):841-854. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12489. Epub 2019 Jul 4. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2019. PMID: 31273875
Cited by
-
Characteristics, Regional Evaluation, and D-Antigen in Transfusions by Emergency Medical Services.JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2524368. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.24368. JAMA Netw Open. 2025. PMID: 40742584 Free PMC article.
-
A comparative analysis of current out-of-hospital transfusion protocols to expert recommendations.Resusc Plus. 2023 Nov 8;16:100498. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100498. eCollection 2023 Dec. Resusc Plus. 2023. PMID: 38026143 Free PMC article.
-
Prehospital transfusion training in Canada: a national survey of critical care transport organizations.Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 1;33(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s13049-025-01435-x. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2025. PMID: 40598343 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Rehn M, Weaver A, Brohi K, et al. Effect of prehospital red blood cell transfusion on mortality and time of death in civilian trauma patients. Shock. 2019;51:284–8. - PubMed
-
- Shand S, Curtis K, Dinh M, et al. What is the impact of prehospital blood product administration for patients with catastrophic haemorrhage: an integrative review. Injury. 2019;50:226–34. - PubMed
-
- Crombie N, Doughty HA, Bishop JRB, et al. RePHILL collaborative group. Resuscitation with blood products in patients with trauma-related haemorrhagic shock receiving prehospital care (RePHILL): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2022;9:e250–61. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Sperry JL, Guyette FX, Brown JB, et al. PAMPer Study Group. Prehospital plasma during air medical transport in trauma patients at risk for hemorrhagic shock. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:315–26. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical