Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun;40(2):571-585.
doi: 10.1007/s10899-023-10234-x. Epub 2023 Jun 27.

Two for the GOES: Exploring Gambling Outcome Expectancies Scores Across Mixed and Offline-Only Gamblers in Relation to Problem Gambling Risk Status

Affiliations

Two for the GOES: Exploring Gambling Outcome Expectancies Scores Across Mixed and Offline-Only Gamblers in Relation to Problem Gambling Risk Status

Andrea C Richardson et al. J Gambl Stud. 2024 Jun.

Abstract

As online gambling becomes more prevalent, understanding the motives of online gamblers has become a key focus for research and practice. The aim of this study was to understand differences in gambling-related outcome expectancies between mixed (both online and offline) gamblers and offline-only gamblers, by incorporating gambling harm risk categories from the problem gambling severity index (PGSI). This study comprised a secondary data analysis of the 2015 Northern Territory Gambling Prevalence and Wellbeing Survey. A sample of 1207 individuals in the Northern Territory who had reported gambling at least once in the previous 12 months were used in the analyses. General linear and structural equation modelling were used to ascertain differences in gambling outcome expectancies, in relation to gambling modality (i.e., mixed, offline-only) and PGSI scores. Mixed gamblers tended to score higher on all outcome expectancies than their offline-only counterparts. Outcome expectancy scores were higher in individuals in higher-risk PGSI categories. The escape outcome expectancy was dependent on both modality and risk category. Invariance testing of a low and problem gambling risk subsample revealed differential relationships for both the escape and excitement outcome expectancies for mixed and offline-only gamblers. The results provide an important contribution to the existing literature regarding motivation and outcome expectancies in relation to gambling modality and problem gambling severity. The findings highlight the importance of considering both gambling outcome expectancies and modality when considering problem gambling.

Keywords: Gambling; Gambling-related harm; Motivation; Online gambling; Outcome expectancies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Means plots for each of the GOES subscales, by PGSI category, between mixed and offline-only gamblers. A significant interaction effect was observed for the Escape subscale only (p = .002)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Path model showing standardised estimates from GOES subscales to log-transformed PGSI scores. *p < .05

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abbott, M. W., Binde, P., Clark, L., Hodgins, D. C., Johnson, M. R., Manitowabi, D., Quilty, L. C., Spangberg, J., Volberg, R. A., Walker, D. M., & Williams, R. J. (2018). Conceptual framework of harmful gambling (3rd ed.). Gambling Research Exchange Ontario. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Australian Communications and Media Authority. (2022). The role of affiliate services in promoting illegal online gambling in Australia: Desktop research. https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2022-02/
    1. Australian Government Productivity Commission. (2010). Gambling. Australian Government Productivity Commission. https://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/completed/gambling-2010/report
    1. Binde, P. (2011). What are the most harmful forms of gambling? Analyzing problem gambling prevalence surveys. CEFOS Working Papers 12. CEFOS.
    1. Binde, P. (2013). Why people gamble: A model with five motivational dimensions. International Gambling Studies,13(1), 81–97. 10.1080/14459795.2012.71215010.1080/14459795.2012.712150 - DOI