Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 20;13(12):2128.
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13122128.

Determination of Anti-Xa Inhibitor Plasma Concentrations Using a Universal Edoxaban Calibrator

Affiliations

Determination of Anti-Xa Inhibitor Plasma Concentrations Using a Universal Edoxaban Calibrator

Annika Burger et al. Diagnostics (Basel). .

Abstract

A universal calibrator for the determination of all anti-Xa inhibitors would support laboratory processes. We aimed to test the clinical performance of an anti-Xa assay utilizing a universal edoxaban calibrator to determine clinically relevant concentrations of all anti-Xa inhibitors. Following a pilot study, we enrolled 553 consecutive patients taking rivaroxaban, edoxaban, or apixaban from nine study centers in a prospective cross-sectional study. The Technochrom® anti-Xa assay was conducted using the Technoview® edoxaban calibrator. Using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), anti-Xa inhibitor drug concentrations were determined. Sensitivities and specificities to detect three clinically relevant drug concentrations (30 µgL-1, 50 µgL-1, 100 µgL-1) were determined. Overall, 300 patients treated with rivaroxaban, 221 with apixaban, and 32 with edoxaban were included. The overall correlation coefficient (rs) was 0.95 (95% CI 0.94, 0.96). An area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.96 for 30 µgL-1, 0.98 for 50 µgL-1, and 0.99 for 100 µgL-1 was found. The sensitivities were 92.3% (95% CI 89.2, 94.6), 92.7% (89.4, 95.1), and 94.8% (91.1, 97.0), respectively (specificities 82.2%, 93.7%, and 94.4%). In conclusion, the clinical performance of a universal, edoxaban-calibrated anti-Xa assay was solid and most drug concentrations were predicted correctly.

Keywords: anti-Xa assay; anticoagulants introduction; apixaban; diagnostic accuracy; edoxaban; laboratory monitoring; rivaroxaban.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

MN reports research grants from Bayer Healthcare, outside of the submitted work, lecture honoraria from Bayer Healthcare, and Daiichi Sankyo. LA reports research grants from Bayer, CSL-Behring, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Roche, Sobi, and Takeda. WAW reports research grants from Bayer Healthcare, BMS-Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, and Sanofi, and honoraria for participating in scientific advisory boards from Bayer, Pfizer, and from Alexion Pharma GmbH, all outside the submitted work. JDS reports lecture fees and advisory honoraria from Bayer Healthcare, Pfizer, Takeda, Siemens, and Sanofi. TCS holds an endowed professorship supported by the Touring Club Switzerland. BG reports non-financial support and funding for an accredited continuing medical education program from Axonlab, and from Thermo Fisher Scientific, during the conduct of the study; personal fees and funding for an accredited continuing medical education program from Alnylam; grants, personal fees and funding for accredited continuing medical education program from Pfizer; funding for an accredited continuing medical education program from Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, Takeda, Octapharma, SOBI, Janssen, Novo Nordisk, and Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, outside the submitted work. NBB is an employee and stakeholder of Technoclone.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The flow of the patients.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Scattergram showing the association between edoxaban-calibrated anti-Xa activity and the measurements of LC-MS/MS by drug. The overall correlation (rs) was 0.94 (95% CI 0.93, 0.95). It was 0.95 for rivaroxaban (95% CI 0.94, 0.96), 0.93 for apixaban (95% CI 0.91, 0.95), and 0.93 for edoxaban (95% CI 0.86, 0.97).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution of edoxaban-calibrated anti-Xa measurements in patients with and without clinically relevant drug concentrations (30 µgL−1, 50 µgL−1, 100 µgL−1). The cut-off thresholds were determined using a receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) analysis. The sensitivities were 92.3% (30 µgL−1; 95% CI 89.2, 94.6), 92.7% (50 µgL−1; 95% CI 89.4, 95.1), and 94.8% (100 µgL−1; 95% CI 91.1, 97.0). The specificities were 82.2% (95% CI 75.6, 87.3), 93.7% (95% CI 89.7, 96.2), and 94.4% (95% CI 91.3, 96.4).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Receiver operating characteristics curves demonstrating the diagnostic accuracy of an edoxaban-calibrated anti-Xa assay for the prediction of clinically relevant drug concentrations (30 µgL−1, 50 µgL−1, 100 µgL−1).

References

    1. Levy J.H., Ageno W., Chan N.C., Crowther M., Verhamme P., Weitz J.I. for the Subcommittee on Control of Anticoagulation. When and how to use antidotes for the reversal of direct oral anticoagulants: Guidance from the SSC of the ISTH. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2016;14:623–627. doi: 10.1111/jth.13227. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cuker A., Siegal D. Monitoring and reversal of direct oral anticoagulants. Hematology/the Education Program of the American Society of Hematology. Am. Soc. Hematol. Educ. Program. 2015;2015:117–124. doi: 10.1182/asheducation.V2015.1.117.3916182. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adcock D.M., Gosselin R. Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) in the Laboratory: 2015 Review. Thromb. Res. 2015;136:7–12. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2015.05.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cuker A., Burnett A., Triller D., Crowther M., Ansell J., Van Cott E.M., Wirth D., Kaatz S. Reversal of direct oral anticoagulants: Guidance from the Anticoagulation Forum. Am. J. Hematol. 2019;94:697–709. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25475. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chan N., Sobieraj-Teague M., Eikelboom J.W. Direct oral anticoagulants: Evidence and unresolved issues. Lancet. 2020;396:1767–1776. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32439-9. - DOI - PubMed