Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 May 28;12(6):783.
doi: 10.3390/biology12060783.

Estimation of Late Postmortem Interval: Where Do We Stand? A Literature Review

Affiliations
Review

Estimation of Late Postmortem Interval: Where Do We Stand? A Literature Review

Lorenzo Franceschetti et al. Biology (Basel). .

Abstract

Estimating time since death can be challenging for forensic experts, and is one of the most challenging activities concerning the forensic world. Various methods have been assessed to calculate the postmortem interval on dead bodies in different stages of decomposition and are currently widely used. Nowadays, the only well-recognized dating technique is carbon-14 radioisotope measurement, whereas other methods have been tested throughout the years involving different disciplines with different and sometimes not univocal results. Today, there is no precise and secure method to precisely determine time since death, and late postmortem interval estimation remains one of the most debated topics in forensic pathology. Many proposed methods have shown promising results, and it is desirable that with further studies some of them might become acknowledged techniques to resolve such a difficult and important challenge. The present review aims at presenting studies about the different techniques that have been tested in order to find a valuable method for estimating time since death for skeletal remains. By providing a comprehensive overview, the purpose of this work is to offer readers new perspectives on postmortem interval estimation and to improve current practice in the management of skeletal remains and decomposed bodies.

Keywords: advanced decomposition; best practices; late postmortem interval; multidisciplinary assessment; postmortem interval estimation; skeletal remains.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA review chart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Illustration of the flow chart to be followed in case of late PMI estimation.

References

    1. Madea B. Methods for determining time of death. Forensic Sci. Med. Pathol. 2016;12:451–485. doi: 10.1007/s12024-016-9776-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang Q., Lin H.C., Xu J.R., Huang P., Wang Z.Y. Current Research and Prospects on Postmortem Interval Estimation. Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018;34:459–467. - PubMed
    1. Brooks J.W. Postmortem Changes in Animal Carcasses and Estimation of the Postmortem Interval. Veter- Pathol. 2016;53:929–940. doi: 10.1177/0300985816629720. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Franceschetti L., Pradelli J., Tuccia F., Giordani G., Cattaneo C., Vanin S. Comparison of Accumulated Degree-Days and Entomological Approaches in Post Mortem Interval Estimation. Insects. 2021;12:264. doi: 10.3390/insects12030264. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maile A.E., Inoue C.G., Barksdale L.E., Carter D.O. Toward a universal equation to estimate postmortem interval. Forensic Sci. Int. 2017;272:150–153. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.01.013. - DOI - PubMed