Flat Magnetic Stimulation for Stress Urinary Incontinence: A 3-Month Follow-Up Study
- PMID: 37372848
- PMCID: PMC10298542
- DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11121730
Flat Magnetic Stimulation for Stress Urinary Incontinence: A 3-Month Follow-Up Study
Abstract
Background: flat magnetic stimulation is based on a stimulation produced by electromagnetic fields with a homogenous profile. Patients with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) can take advantage of this treatment. We aimed to evaluate medium-term subjective, objective, and quality-of-life outcomes in patients with stress urinary incontinence to evaluate possible maintenance schedules.
Methods: a prospective evaluation through the administration of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF), the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ7), and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) was performed at three different time points: at the baseline (T0), at the end of treatment (T1), and at 3-month follow-up (T2). The stress test and the Patient Global Impression of Improvement questionnaire (PGI-I) defined objective and subjective outcomes, respectively.
Results: 25 consecutive patients were enrolled. A statistically significant reduction in the IIQ7 and ICIQ-SF scores was noticed at T1 returned to levels comparable to the baseline at T2. However, objective improvement remained significant even at a 3-month follow-up. Moreover, the PGI-I scores at T1 and T2 were comparable, demonstrating stable subjective satisfaction.
Conclusion: despite a certain persistence of the objective and subjective continence improvement, the urinary-related quality of life decreases and returns to baseline values three months after the end of flat magnetic stimulation. These findings indicate that a further cycle of treatment is probably indicated after 3 months since benefits are only partially maintained after this timespan.
Keywords: magnetic stimulation; pelvic floor disorders; quality of life; stress urinary incontinence.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Manodoro S., Spelzini F., Cesana M.C., Frigerio M., Maggioni D., Ceresa C., Penati C., Sicuri M., Fruscio R., Nicolini G., et al. Histologic and metabolic assessment in a cohort of patients with genital prolapse: Preoperative stage and recurrence investigations. Minerva Ginecol. 2017;69:233–238. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4784.16.03977-0. - DOI - PubMed