Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 16;12(12):4095.
doi: 10.3390/jcm12124095.

Uncovering Predictors of Lipid Goal Attainment in Type 2 Diabetes Outpatients Using Logic Learning Machine: Insights from the AMD Annals and AMD Artificial Intelligence Study Group

Affiliations

Uncovering Predictors of Lipid Goal Attainment in Type 2 Diabetes Outpatients Using Logic Learning Machine: Insights from the AMD Annals and AMD Artificial Intelligence Study Group

Davide Masi et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Identifying and treating lipid abnormalities is crucial for preventing cardiovascular disease in diabetic patients, yet only two-thirds of patients reach recommended cholesterol levels. Elucidating the factors associated with lipid goal attainment represents an unmet clinical need. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a real-world analysis of the lipid profiles of 11.252 patients from the Annals of the Italian Association of Medical Diabetologists (AMD) database from 2005 to 2019. We used a Logic Learning Machine (LLM) to extract and classify the most relevant variables predicting the achievement of a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) value lower than 100 mg/dL (2.60 mmol/L) within two years of the start of lipid-lowering therapy. Our analysis showed that 61.4% of the patients achieved the treatment goal. The LLM model demonstrated good predictive performance, with a precision of 0.78, accuracy of 0.69, recall of 0.70, F1 Score of 0.74, and ROC-AUC of 0.79. The most significant predictors of achieving the treatment goal were LDL-C values at the start of lipid-lowering therapy and their reduction after six months. Other predictors of a greater likelihood of reaching the target included high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, albuminuria, and body mass index at baseline, as well as younger age, male sex, more follow-up visits, no therapy discontinuation, higher Q-score, lower blood glucose and HbA1c levels, and the use of anti-hypertensive medication. At baseline, for each LDL-C range analysed, the LLM model also provided the minimum reduction that needs to be achieved by the next six-month visit to increase the likelihood of reaching the therapeutic goal within two years. These findings could serve as a useful tool to inform therapeutic decisions and to encourage further in-depth analysis and testing.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; dyslipidemia; low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; machine learning; type 2 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart regarding the selection of patients with type 2 diabetes who visited one of 271 diabetes centres between 2005 and 2019.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Gender differences in LDL-C at time T0, broken down by those who presented an LDL-C below 100 mg/dL and those who did not; **** p-value < 0.0001.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Gender differences in the number of patients presenting with an LDL-C lower than 100 mg/dL (2.60 mmol/L) at time T0, T6M, and T2Y.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The trend of LDL-C averages of different patient groups according to the starting LDL-C range (with a minimum number of 200 patients for curve points).
Figure 5
Figure 5
The trend of LDL-C averages of different patient groups according to different statin administration.
Figure 6
Figure 6
LLM-model with the FR of the most relevant variables predicting achievement of the C-LDL goal at T2Y.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Percentage reduction in LDL-C at T6M compared to baseline based on LDL-C ranges and divided by target attainment at T2Y.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Distribution of patients achieving and not achieving the LDL-C target by type of antidiabetic prescribed.

References

    1. Wong N.D., Sattar N. Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Mellitus: Epidemiology, Assessment and Prevention. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2023;1:1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41569-023-00877-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ali M.K., Pearson-Stuttard J., Selvin E., Gregg E.W. Interpreting Global Trends in Type 2 Diabetes Complications and Mortality. Diabetologia. 2022;65:3–13. doi: 10.1007/s00125-021-05585-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wu L., Parhofer K.G. Diabetic Dyslipidemia. Metabolism. 2014;63:1469–1479. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2014.08.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mann D.M. Trends in Medication Use Among US Adults with Diabetes Mellitus: Glycemic Control at the Expense of Controlling Cardiovascular Risk Factors. Arch. Intern Med. 2009;169:1718. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.296. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dyrbus K., Gasior M., Desperak P., Nowak J., Osadnik T., Banach M. Characteristics of Lipid Profile and Effectiveness of Management of Dyslipidaemia in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes–Data from the TERCET Registry with 19,287 Patients. Pharmacol. Res. 2019;139:460–466. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2018.12.002. - DOI - PubMed

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources