Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 May 29;59(6):1047.
doi: 10.3390/medicina59061047.

New Insights into the Fluid Management in Patients with Septic Shock

Charalampos D Moschopoulos  1 , Dimitra Dimopoulou  2 , Anastasia Dimopoulou  3 , Konstantina Dimopoulou  4 , Konstantinos Protopapas  1 , Nikolaos Zavras  5 , Sotirios Tsiodras  1 , Anastasia Kotanidou  6 , Paraskevi C Fragkou  6
Affiliations
Review

New Insights into the Fluid Management in Patients with Septic Shock

Charalampos D Moschopoulos et al. Medicina (Kaunas). .

Abstract

The importance of fluid resuscitation therapy during the early stages of sepsis management is a well-established principle. Current Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines recommend the early administration of intravenous crystalloid fluids for sepsis-related hypotension or hyperlactatemia due to tissue hypoperfusion, within the first 3 h of resuscitation and suggest using balanced solutions (BSs) instead of normal saline (NS) for the management of patients with sepsis or septic shock. Studies comparing BS versus NS administration in septic patients have demonstrated that BSs are associated with better outcomes including decreased mortality. After initial resuscitation, fluid administration has to be judicious in order to avoid fluid overload, which has been associated with increased mortality, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and worsening of acute kidney injury. The "one size fits all" approach may be "convenient" but it should be avoided. Personalized fluid management, based on patient-specific hemodynamic indices, provides the foundations for better patient outcomes in the future. Although there is a consensus on the need for adequate fluid therapy in sepsis, the type, the amount of administered fluids, and the ideal fluid resuscitation strategy remain elusive. Well-designed large randomized controlled trials are certainly needed to compare fluid choices specifically in the septic patient, as there is currently limited evidence of low quality. This review aims to summarize the physiologic principles and current scientific evidence regarding fluid management in patients with sepsis, as well as to provide a comprehensive overview of the latest data on the optimal fluid administration strategy in sepsis.

Keywords: balanced crystalloids; fluids; liberal fluids; restricted fluids; resuscitation; saline; sepsis; septic shock.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Proposed algorithm of fluid resuscitation in patients with sepsis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Characteristics of the four distinct phases of intravenous fluid therapy: resuscitation, optimization, stabilization, and evacuation (ROSE).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Singer M., Deutschman C.S., Seymour C.W., Shankar-Hari M., Annane D., Bauer M., Bellomo R., Bernard G.R., Chiche J.-D., Coopersmith C.M., et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) JAMA. 2016;315:801–810. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rudd K.E., Johnson S.C., Agesa K.M., Shackelford K.A., Tsoi D., Kievlan D.R., Colombara D.V., Ikuta K.S., Kissoon N., Finfer S., et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 2020;395:200–211. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Evans L., Rhodes A., Alhazzani W., Antonelli M., Coopersmith C.M., French C., Machado F.R., Mcintyre L., Ostermann M., Prescott H.C., et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: International guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensiv. Care Med. 2021;47:1181–1247. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hotchkiss R.S., Karl I.E. The Pathophysiology and Treatment of Sepsis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003;348:138–150. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra021333. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Angus D.C., van der Poll T. Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013;369:840–851. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1208623. - DOI - PubMed