Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 15;59(6):1153.
doi: 10.3390/medicina59061153.

Impact of Age on Long-Term Urinary Continence after Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Affiliations

Impact of Age on Long-Term Urinary Continence after Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Cristina Cano Garcia et al. Medicina (Kaunas). .

Abstract

Aim and Objectives: We aimed to test the impact of age on long-term urinary continence (≥12 months) in patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Methods and Materials: We relied on an institutional tertiary-care database to identify the patients who underwent robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy between January 2014 and January 2021. Patients were divided into three age groups: age group one (≤60 years), age group two (61-69 years) and age group three (≥70 years). Multivariable logistic regression models tested the differences between the age groups in the analyses addressing long-term urinary continence after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Results: Of the 201 prostate cancer patients treated with robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, 49 (24%) were assigned to age group one (≤60 years), 93 (46%) to age group two (61-69 years) and 59 (29%) to age group three (≥70 years). The three age groups differed according to long-term urinary continence: 90% vs. 84% vs. 69% for, respectively, age group one vs. two vs. three (p = 0.018). In the multivariable logistic regression, age group one (Odds Ratio (OR) 4.73, 95% CI 1.44-18.65, p = 0.015) and 2 (OR 2.94; 95% CI 1.23-7.29; p = 0.017) were independent predictors for urinary continence, compared to age group three. Conclusion: Younger age, especially ≤60 years, was associated with better urinary continence after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. This observation is important at the point of patient education and should be discussed in informed consent.

Keywords: age; robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy; urinary continence; urinary incontinence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., Laversanne M., Soerjomataram I., Jemal A., Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71:209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pompe R.S., Tian Z., Preisser F., Tennstedt P., Beyer B., Michl U., Graefen M., Huland H., Karakiewicz P.I., Tilki D. Short- and Long-term Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life after Radical Prostatectomy: Patient-reported Outcomes from a Tertiary High-volume Center. Eur. Urol. Focus. 2017;3:615–620. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.08.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Haese A., Knipper S., Isbarn H., Heinzer H., Tilki D., Salomon G., Michl U., Steuber T., Budäus L., Maurer T., et al. A comparative study of robot-assisted and open radical prostatectomy in 10 790 men treated by highly trained surgeons for both procedures. BJU Int. 2019;123:1031–1040. doi: 10.1111/bju.14760. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hamdy F.C., Donovan J.L., Lane J.A., Mason M., Metcalfe C., Holding P., Davis M., Peters T.J., Turner E.L., Martin R.M., et al. 10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;375:1415–1424. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606220. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wilt T.J., Brawer M.K., Jones K.M., Barry M.J., Aronson W.J., Fox S., Gingrich J.R., Wei J.T., Gilhooly P., Grob B.M., et al. Radical Prostatectomy versus Observation for Localized Prostate Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012;367:203–213. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1113162. - DOI - PMC - PubMed