Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jun 16;11(6):1597.
doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11061597.

The Neonatal Immune System and Respiratory Pathogens

Affiliations
Review

The Neonatal Immune System and Respiratory Pathogens

Colleen J Sedney et al. Microorganisms. .

Abstract

Neonates are more susceptible to some pathogens, particularly those that cause infection in the respiratory tract. This is often attributed to an incompletely developed immune system, but recent work demonstrates effective neonatal immune responses to some infection. The emerging view is that neonates have a distinctly different immune response that is well-adapted to deal with unique immunological challenges of the transition from a relatively sterile uterus to a microbe-rich world, tending to suppress potentially dangerous inflammatory responses. Problematically, few animal models allow a mechanistic examination of the roles and effects of various immune functions in this critical transition period. This limits our understanding of neonatal immunity, and therefore our ability to rationally design and develop vaccines and therapeutics to best protect newborns. This review summarizes what is known of the neonatal immune system, focusing on protection against respiratory pathogens and describes challenges of various animal models. Highlighting recent advances in the mouse model, we identify knowledge gaps to be addressed.

Keywords: mouse models; neonatal immunity; respiratory pathogens.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic view of factors contributing to the inhibition of TH1 polarization and promotion of TH2 polarization in the neonatal pulmonary environment. Red arrows indicate decreased production and blue arrows indicate increased production. Illustration by Sofia Nahman, Educational Resources, University of Georgia College of Veterinary Medicine.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relative frequency of immune cell types/subsets in the neonatal pulmonary immune system [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. Illustration by Sofia Nahman, Educational Resources, University of Georgia College of Veterinary Medicine.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effects of Bordetella pertussis (A), respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) (B), and influenza (C) on the neonatal pulmonary response. Blue arrows represent promoted/increased production. Red lines represent decreased/inhibited production. Illustration by Sofia Nahman, Educational Resources, University of Georgia College of Veterinary Medicine.

References

    1. Rudd B.D. Neonatal T Cells: A Reinterpretation. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2020;38:229–247. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-091319-083608. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tsafaras G.P., Ntontsi P., Xanthou G. Advantages and Limitations of the Neonatal Immune System. Front. Pediatr. 2020;8:5. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Forsthuber T., Yip H.C., Lehmann P.V. Induction of TH1 and TH2 Immunity in Neonatal Mice. Science. 1996;271:1728–1730. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5256.1728. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adkins B., Du R.-Q. Newborn Mice Develop Balanced Th1/Th2 Primary Effector Responses In Vivo but Are Biased to Th2 Secondary Responses. J. Immunol. 1998;160:4217–4224. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.160.9.4217. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Harbeson D., Ben-Othman R., Amenyogbe N., Kollmann T. Outgrowing the Immaturity Myth: The Cost of Defending from Neonatal Infectious Disease. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:1077. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01077. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources