Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun;27(6):386-391.
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24473.

Safety Goggles with Elastic Headband to Improve N95 Fit Following Failed Quantitative Fit Test

Affiliations

Safety Goggles with Elastic Headband to Improve N95 Fit Following Failed Quantitative Fit Test

Mohamed Kamal et al. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2023 Jun.

Abstract

Introduction: N95 respirators, together with eye protection, form vital elements of personal protective equipment (PPE) for healthcare workers (HCW) caring for patients with respiratory infections, such as COVID-19. Duckbill N95 respirators are widely used but have a high failure rate when Fit Tested. The commonest site for inward leaks is the region between the nose and maxilla. Safety goggles with an elastic headband may press the upper rim of the respirator against the face, thereby reducing inward leaks. We hypothesized that the use of safety goggles with an elastic headband will improve the overall fit-factor of a duckbill N95 respirator and increase the proportion of users who pass a quantitative Fit Test.

Methods: About 60 volunteer HCWs, who had previously failed quantitative Fit Testing with a duckbill N95 respirator, participated in this before-and-after intervention study. A PortaCount® 8048 was used for quantitative Fit Testing. The test was first performed with a duckbill N95 respirator only. It was then repeated after participants donned a pair of safety goggles (3M Fahrenheit, ID 70071531621).

Results: Before the intervention, i.e., with the respirator only, 8 (13.3%) participants passed their Fit Test. This increased to 49 (81.7%) after the application of safety goggles (OR 42, 95% CI 7.14-1697.9, p < 0.0001). The adjusted mean overall fit factor, using Tobit regression analysis, increased from 40.3 to 193.0 (t = 12.32, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The use of safety goggles with an elastic headband significantly increases the proportion of users who pass a quantitative Fit Test and improves the fit-factor of a duckbill N95 respirator.

How to cite this article: Kamal M, Bhatti M, Stewart WC, Johns M, Collins D, Shehabi Y, et al. Safety Goggles with Elastic Headband to Improve N95 Fit Following Failed Quantitative Fit Test. Indian J Crit Care Med 2023;27(6):386-391.

Keywords: COVID-19; Eye protection; Fit Test; Goggles; N95 respirators; Personal protective equipment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: None

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PortaCount Respirator Fit Tester 8048 | TSI
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Proshield® duckbill N95 respirator | BSN Medical
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
(A) Demonstrates the common site of inward leak for an N95 respirator; (B) Shows the modified N95 respirator and safety goggles pressing the gap between the nose and the cheeks
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Fahrenheit antifog safety goggles | 3M
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Testing sequence
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Tube connecting PortaCount® to participant's respirator
Equation 1
Equation 1
The formula used to calculate the overall fit-factor. Fit-factor is represented as “ff” in the equation
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Adjusted mean overall fit-factor calculated using Tobit regression analysis. The horizonal dashed line represents the pass/fail threshold
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Proportion of participants who passed (ff ≥ 100) and failed (ff < 100) the overall Fit Test before and after the use of the safety goggle

References

    1. WHO. Infection Prevention and Control during Healthcare when Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) is Suspected or Confirmed; 2021
    1. Australian Department of Health. Guidance on the Use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in Hospitals during the COVID-19 Outbreak; 2020
    1. NSW Clinical Excellence Commission. Respiratory Protection Program Manual. 2020 1st edition;
    1. Nguyen LH, Drew DA, Graham MS, Joshi AD, Guo CG, Ma W, et al. Risk of COVID-19 among front-line health-care workers and the general community: A prospective cohort study. Lancet Public Health. 2020;5(9):e475–e483. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30164-X. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Patel MP, Kute VB, Goswami J, Balwani MR. Hospitals may become “Disease Hotspots” for COVID-19 amid shortage of personal protective equipment. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020;24(11):1145–1146. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23645. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources