Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 1;46(8):1507-1514.
doi: 10.2337/dc23-0560.

Effect of Early Glycemic Control in Youth-Onset Type 2 Diabetes on Longer-Term Glycemic Control and β-Cell Function: Results From the TODAY Study

Collaborators

Effect of Early Glycemic Control in Youth-Onset Type 2 Diabetes on Longer-Term Glycemic Control and β-Cell Function: Results From the TODAY Study

TODAY Study Group. Diabetes Care. .

Abstract

Objective: Little is known about the impact of early attainment of tight glycemic control on long-term β-cell function and glycemic control in youth-onset type 2 diabetes. We examined the effect of the initial 6 months of glycemic control on β-cell function and glycemic control longitudinally over 9 years and the impact of sex, race/ethnicity, and BMI on these relationships in adolescents with youth-onset type 2 diabetes in the Treatment Options for Type 2 Diabetes in Adolescents and Youth (TODAY) study.

Research design and methods: Oral glucose tolerance tests were performed longitudinally through year 9 to derive estimates of insulin sensitivity and secretion. Early glycemia was defined by mean HbA1c during the first 6 months postrandomization, categorized into five HbA1c groups (<5.7%, 5.7 to <6.4%, 6.4 to <7.0%, 7.0 to <8.0%, and ≥8.0%). The long-term period was defined as the period between years 2 and 9.

Results: A total of 656 participants (64.8% female, baseline mean age 14 years, diabetes duration <2 years) had longitudinal data available over an average of 6.4 ± 3.2 years of follow-up. HbA1c significantly increased in all early glycemic groups during years 2-9, with a steeper increase (+0.40%/year) among participants with the tightest initial control (mean early HbA1c <5.7%), in parallel to a decline in the C-peptide-derived disposition index. Nevertheless, the lower HbA1c categories continued to have relatively lower HbA1c over time.

Conclusions: Early tight glycemic control in the TODAY study was related to β-cell reserve and translated to better long-term glycemic control. However, tight early glycemic control on the randomized treatment in the TODAY study did not prevent deterioration of β-cell function.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Funding and Duality of Interest. The following companies provided donations in support of the TODAY study’s efforts: Becton, Dickinson and Company, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, GlaxoSmithKline, LifeScan, Inc., Pfizer, and Sanofi. This work was completed with funding from the NIDDK and the National Institutes of Health Office of the Director through grants U01-DK61212, U01-DK61230, U01-DK61239, U01-DK61242, and U01-DK61254. No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Longer-term (study years 2–9) rates of change of HbA1c, insulin sensitivity, C-peptide index, C-oDI, and AUC0–30 C-peptide/glucose (AUC Cpep/Glu) index by the five early-glycemia groups (defined as change in HbA1c in 0–6 months). Linear mixed-effects models (unadjusted) were used for assessment of the effect of early glycemia categorized into five groups (<5.7%, 5.7–6.3%, 6.4–6.9%, 7.0–7.9%, and ≥8.0%) on longer-term outcomes means for HbA1c (A), insulin sensitivity (B), C-peptide index (C), C-oDI (D), and AUC0–30 C-peptide/glucose index (E) during study years 2–9. Log-transformed values of the outcomes were used for insulin sensitivity, C-peptide index, and C-oDI. Predicted means of the outcomes (arithmetic means for A and E; geometric means for B, C, and D) over time in each of the five groups are plotted, and the slope (β ± SE) representing the estimated change in the outcome per year is provided in each panel. Asterisks indicate if the slope is significantly increasing or decreasing (i.e., different from 0 or a flat line): *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01. Mean baseline BMI in each of the five groups is given in the legend for panel A. Significant differences (P < 0.05) in slopes between the five groups were evaluated in each linear mixed-effects model and are reported in each panel. Sample sizes at years 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 9 in the longer-term period were 495, 411, 392, 374, 349, and 300, respectively.

References

    1. Bjornstad P, Drews KL, Caprio S, et al.; TODAY Study Group . Long-term complications in youth-onset type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2021;385:416–426 - PMC - PubMed
    1. RISE Consortium Investigators . Effects of treatment of impaired glucose tolerance or recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes with metformin alone or in combination with insulin glargine on β-cell function: comparison of responses in youth and adults. Diabetes 2019;68:1670–1680 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Utzschneider KM, Tripputi MT, Kozedub A, et al.; RISE Consortium . Differential loss of β-cell function in youth vs. adults following treatment withdrawal in the Restoring Insulin Secretion (RISE) study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2021;178:108948. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arslanian SA, El Ghormli L, Kim JY, et al.; RISE Consortium . OGTT glucose response curves, insulin sensitivity, and β-cell function in RISE: comparison between youth and adults at randomization and in response to interventions to preserve β-cell function. Diabetes Care 2021;44:817–825 - PMC - PubMed
    1. RISE Consortium . Metabolic contrasts between youth and adults with impaired glucose tolerance or recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes: I. Observations using the hyperglycemic clamp. Diabetes Care 2018;41:1696–1706 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types