Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2023 Jun 28;18(6):e0285748.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285748. eCollection 2023.

Timing of invasive mechanical ventilation and death in critically ill adults with COVID-19: A multicenter cohort study

Collaborators, Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Timing of invasive mechanical ventilation and death in critically ill adults with COVID-19: A multicenter cohort study

Adam Green et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate if the timing of initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) for critically ill patients with COVID-19 is associated with mortality.

Materials and methods: The data for this study were derived from a multicenter cohort study of critically ill adults with COVID-19 admitted to ICUs at 68 hospitals across the US from March 1 to July 1, 2020. We examined the association between early (ICU days 1-2) versus late (ICU days 3-7) initiation of IMV and time-to-death. Patients were followed until the first of hospital discharge, death, or 90 days. We adjusted for confounding using a multivariable Cox model.

Results: Among the 1879 patients included in this analysis (1199 male [63.8%]; median age, 63 [IQR, 53-72] years), 1526 (81.2%) initiated IMV early and 353 (18.8%) initiated IMV late. A total of 644 of the 1526 patients (42.2%) in the early IMV group died, and 180 of the 353 (51.0%) in the late IMV group died (adjusted HR 0.77 [95% CI, 0.65-0.93]).

Conclusions: In critically ill adults with respiratory failure from COVID-19, early compared to late initiation of IMV is associated with reduced mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Study cohort and emulated trial flow.
Abbreviations: ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; IMV, invasive mechanical ventilation.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Mortality in early versus late initiation of IMV groups.
Abbreviations: IMV, invasive mechanical ventilation.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Primary and subgroup analyses examining mortality in early versus late initiation of IMV groups.
The hazard ratios are adjusted for the following covariates: age; sex; race; body mass index; hypertension; diabetes mellitus; coronary artery disease; congestive heart failure; chronic lung disease; active malignancy; days from symptom onset to ICU admission; hospital size (number of pre-COVID-19 ICU beds); and severity-of-illness covariates assessed on the day of IMV initiation (the renal, liver, and coagulation components of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score [13], the PaO2:FiO2 ratio, shock, concurrent therapies received [corticosteroids; tocilizumab; prone positioning; neuromuscular blockade], and inflammation. Sensitivity analysis #1 kept discharged patients in the risk set until day 90. Sensitivity analysis #2 excluded patients who died in the first 7 days of ICU admission, with follow-up for each patient starting on day 8 after ICU admission. Sensitivity analysis #3 was further adjusted for date of ICU admission, hospital geographic region, and hospital type. The exploratory analysis included patients not intubated during ICU days 1–7 in the “late IMV” group. Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; HR, hazard ratio; IMV, invasive mechanical ventilation. aInflamation was defined as at least one of the following on the day of IMV initiation or prior: C-reactive protein >100 mg/L, interleukin-6 >80 pg/ml, or ferritin >1,000 ng/mL. Non-inflamed was defined as at least one value below the thresholds above, and no values that were above the thresholds. These thresholds above were selected based on prior studies [–22].

References

    1. Gupta S, Hayek SS, Wang W, et al.. Factors Associated With Death in Critically Ill Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 in the US. JAMA Intern Med. 2020. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3596 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Domecq JP, Lal A, Sheldrick CR, et al.. Outcomes of Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Receiving Organ Support Therapies: The International Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study Registry. Crit Care Med. 2021; 49(3):437–48. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004879 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Recovery Collaborative Group, Horby P, Lim WS, et al.. Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2021; 384(8):693–704. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2021436 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. REMAP-CAP Investigators, Gordon AC Mouncey PR, et al.. Interleukin-6 Receptor Antagonists in Critically Ill Patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2021; 384(16):1491–502. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2100433 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO Solidarity Trial Consortium. Remdesivir and three other drugs for hospitalised patients with COVID-19: final results of the WHO Solidarity randomised trial and updated meta-analyses. Lancet. 2022; 399(10339):1941–53. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00519-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types