Low-Impact Laparoscopy vs Conventional Laparoscopy for Appendectomy: A Prospective Randomized Trial
- PMID: 37382370
- DOI: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000795
Low-Impact Laparoscopy vs Conventional Laparoscopy for Appendectomy: A Prospective Randomized Trial
Abstract
Background: Low-impact laparoscopy (LIL), combining low-pressure insufflation and microlaparoscopy, is a surgical technique that is still not widely used and that has never been evaluated for the management of acute appendicitis. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of an LIL protocol, to compare postoperative pain, average length of stay, and in-hospital use of analgesics by patients who underwent appendectomy according to a conventional laparoscopy or an LIL protocol.
Study design: Patients presenting with acute uncomplicated appendicitis who were operated on between January 1, 2021, and July 10, 2022, were included in this double-blind, single-center, prospective study. They were preoperatively randomly assigned to a group undergoing conventional laparoscopy, ie with an insufflation pressure of 12 mmHg and conventional instrumentation, and an LIL group, with an insufflation pressure of 7 mmHg and microlaparoscopic instrumentation.
Results: Fifty patients were included in this study, 24 in the LIL group and 26 in the conventional group. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 patient groups, including weight and surgical history. The postoperative complication rate was comparable between the 2 groups (p = 0.81). Pain was reported as significantly lower according to the visual analog scale 2 hours after surgery among the LIL group (p = 0.019). For patients who underwent surgery according to the LIL protocol, the study confirms a statistically significant difference for theoretical and actual length of stay, ie -0.77 days and -0.59 days, respectively (p < 0.001 and p = 0.03). In-hospital use of analgesics was comparable between both groups.
Conclusions: In uncomplicated acute appendicitis, the LIL protocol could reduce postoperative pain and average length of stay compared to conventional laparoscopic appendectomy.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04614519.
Copyright © 2023 by the American College of Surgeons. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Invited Commentary: Low-Impact Laparoscopy Could Become the New Standard for Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis.J Am Coll Surg. 2023 Oct 1;237(4):631-632. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000792. Epub 2023 Jul 10. J Am Coll Surg. 2023. PMID: 37427838 No abstract available.
References
-
- Appendicite: définition et fréquence [Internet]. Available at: https://www.ameli.fr/assure/sante/themes/appendicite-aigue/definition-fr... . Accessed December 21, 2019.
-
- Barbois S, Gaget O, Quesada J, et al. Treatment of acute appendicitis in France by type of hospital: patient profiles are different but practices and results are the same, a prospective cohort study of 1241 patients. Surg Open Dig Adv. 2021;4:100028.
-
- Vons C, Barry C, Maitre S, et al. Amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid versus appendicectomy for treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Lond Engl. 2011;377:1573–1579.
-
- Hansson J, Körner U, Khorram-Manesh A, et al. Randomized clinical trial of antibiotic therapy versus appendicectomy as primary treatment of acute appendicitis in unselected patients. Br J Surg. 2009;96:473–481.
-
- Salminen P, Paajanen H, Rautio T, et al. Antibiotic therapy vs appendectomy for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: the APPAC randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;313:2340–2348.