The role of conspiracy mindset in reducing support for child vaccination for COVID-19 in the United States
- PMID: 37384178
- PMCID: PMC10294680
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1175571
The role of conspiracy mindset in reducing support for child vaccination for COVID-19 in the United States
Abstract
Introduction: We have previously proposed and tested a model that predicts reluctance to vaccinate against COVID-19 in the US from embrace of a conspiracy mindset that distrusts the federal health agencies of the US government and regards their intentions as malevolent. In this study, we tested the model's ability to predict adult support for COVID vaccination of children ages 5-11 after the vaccine was approved for this age group.
Methods: Relying on a national panel that was established in April 2021 (N = 1941) and followed until March of 2022, we examined the relation between conspiratorial thinking measured at baseline and belief in misinformation and conspiracies about COVID vaccines, trust in various health authorities, perceived risk of COVID to children, and belief in conspiracy theories about the pandemic's origin and impact. In addition, we tested a structural equation model (SEM) in which conspiracy mindset predicted adult support for childhood vaccination for COVID in January and March of 2022 as well as the adults own vaccination status and their willingness to recommend vaccinating children against measles, mumps and rubella (MMR).
Results: The model accounted for 76% of the variance in support for childhood vaccination for COVID-19; the relation between the mindset and support for vaccination was entirely mediated by baseline assessments of misinformation, trust, risk, and acceptance of pandemic conspiracy theories.
Discussion: The SEM replicated the prior test of the model, indicating that a conspiracy mindset present among at least 17% of the panel underlies their resistance to vaccinate both themselves and children. Efforts to counteract the mindset will likely require the intervention of trusted spokespersons who can overcome the skepticism inherent in conspiratorial thinking about the government and its health-related agencies' recommendations for a particular vaccine.
Keywords: COVID-19; children; conspiracy mindset; conspiracy theories; vaccination hesitancy.
Copyright © 2023 Romer and Jamieson.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Conspiratorial thinking as a precursor to opposition to COVID-19 vaccination in the US: a multi-year study from 2018 to 2021.Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 3;12(1):18632. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22014-5. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 36329136 Free PMC article.
-
Patterns of Media Use, Strength of Belief in COVID-19 Conspiracy Theories, and the Prevention of COVID-19 From March to July 2020 in the United States: Survey Study.J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 27;23(4):e25215. doi: 10.2196/25215. J Med Internet Res. 2021. PMID: 33857008 Free PMC article.
-
Conspiracy theories as barriers to controlling the spread of COVID-19 in the U.S.Soc Sci Med. 2020 Oct;263:113356. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113356. Epub 2020 Sep 21. Soc Sci Med. 2020. PMID: 32967786 Free PMC article.
-
Strategies to address conspiracy beliefs and misinformation on COVID-19 in South Africa: A narrative literature review.Health SA. 2022 Nov 8;27:1851. doi: 10.4102/hsag.v27i0.1851. eCollection 2022. Health SA. 2022. PMID: 36483504 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Systematic review on the association of COVID-19-related conspiracy belief with infection-preventive behavior and vaccination willingness.BMC Psychol. 2022 Mar 15;10(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00771-2. BMC Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35292110 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
When I feel that I am better off, science seems to make the world better off too: inequality, perceived standard of living and perceptions toward science.Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 5;14:1202550. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1202550. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 37868601 Free PMC article.
-
[Mis- and disinformation in social media: mitigating risks in digital health communication].Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2024 Mar;67(3):300-307. doi: 10.1007/s00103-024-03836-2. Epub 2024 Feb 8. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2024. PMID: 38332143 Free PMC article. Review. German.
-
Health Decisions Under Uncertainty: The Roles of Conspiracy Beliefs and Institutional Trust.Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Apr 14;15(4):524. doi: 10.3390/bs15040524. Behav Sci (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40282145 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Abalakina-Paap M., Stephan W. G., Craig T., Gregory W. L. (1999). Beliefs in conspiracies. Polit. Psychol. 20, 637–647. doi: 10.1111/0162-895X.00160 - DOI
-
- Albarracin D., Albarracín J., Chan M. P. S., Jamieson K. H. (2021). Creating conspiracy beliefs: how our thoughts are shaped. New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
- Brondolo E., Kaur A., Flores M. (2023). Structural racism and health in the age of COVID-19: a selective review with policy implications. Soc. Issues Policy Rev. 17, 34–61. doi: 10.1111/sipr.12095 - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous