Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 29;23(1):712.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09681-4.

Barriers to delirium screening and management during hospital admission: a qualitative analysis of inpatient nursing perspectives

Affiliations

Barriers to delirium screening and management during hospital admission: a qualitative analysis of inpatient nursing perspectives

Jacqueline Ragheb et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Delirium in hospitalized patients is a major public health issue, yet delirium is often unrecognized and missed during inpatient admission. The objective of this study was to identify barriers to delirium screening, identification, and management from a nursing perspective on inpatient, acute care units.

Methods: This was a pre-implementation, diagnostic evaluation study to determine current practice patterns and potential barriers to optimizing delirium care at a major university hospital. A qualitative approach was used, which included focus groups of inpatient nurses working on major medical and surgical acute care units. Focus groups were conducted until signs of thematic saturation were present, and data were analyzed via inductive thematic analysis, without predetermined theories or structures. A consensus approach was utilized for transcript coding, and final themes were generated after multiple reviews of initial themes against transcript datasets.

Results: Focus group sessions (n = 3) were held with 18 nurses across two major inpatient units. Nurses reported several barriers to successful delirium screening and management. Specific challenges included difficulty with using delirium screening tools, an organizational culture not conducive to delirium prevention, and competing clinical priorities. Proposed solutions were also discussed, including decision-support systems with automated pager alerts and associated delirium order sets, which may help improve delirium care coordination and standardization.

Conclusion: At a major university hospital, nurses affirm the difficulty experienced with delirium screening and identification, particularly due to screening tool challenges, cultural barriers, and clinical workload. These impediments may serve as targets for a future implementation trial to improve delirium screening and management.

Keywords: Decision support (clinical); Evaluation methodology; Implementation science; Quality Improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ms. McKinney, Dr. Shah, Dr. Min, an Dr. Vlisides receive support from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (Detroit, Michigan, USA) for quality improvement work related to delirium. The opinions, beliefs, and viewpoints expressed by the authors do not necessarily reflect the opinions, beliefs, and viewpoints of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan/Blue Care Network or any of its employees. Dr. Ragheb, Dr. Norcott, and Ms. Benn have no conflicts of interest to report.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Qualitative Study Design Study flow diagram presented. Three focus groups were conducted with 18 inpatient nurses from the medical-surgical units chosen for study participation. After focus group completion, transcripts were generated and reviewed. Codes were generated and incorporated into a main codebook, after which codes were applied to the text to generate major study themes. Themes were then incorporated into an analytical narrative, for which findings were compared to similar, related studies (see Discussion section)

References

    1. Gleason LJ, Schmitt EM, Kosar CM, Tabloski P, Saczynski JS, Robinson T, et al. Effect of delirium and other major complications on outcomes after elective surgery in older adults. JAMA Surg. 2015;150:1134–40. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.2606. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hshieh TT, Saczynski J, Gou RY, Marcantonio E, Jones RN, Schmitt E, et al. Trajectory of functional recovery after postoperative delirium in elective surgery. Ann Surg. 2017;265:647–53. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001952. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Inouye SK, Marcantonio ER, Kosar CM, Tommet D, Schmitt EM, Travison TG, et al. The short-term and long-term relationship between delirium and cognitive trajectory in older surgical patients. Alzheimers Dement. 2016;12:766–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.03.005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leslie DL, Marcantonio ER, Zhang Y, Leo-Summers L, Inouye SK. One-year health care costs associated with delirium in the elderly population. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:27–32. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2007.4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fong TG, Vasunilashorn SM, Libermann T, Marcantonio ER, Inouye SK. Delirium and Alzheimer disease: a proposed model for shared pathophysiology. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019;34:781–9. doi: 10.1002/gps.5088. - DOI - PMC - PubMed