Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Jun 23:11:1179.
doi: 10.12688/f1000research.126555.2. eCollection 2022.

Clinical equivalence of Trusynth fast ® and Vicryl rapide ® polyglactin 910 fast absorbing sutures on maternal morbidity experienced by women following episiotomy repair: a single-blind, randomized study

Dongabanti Hemalatha Devi  1 , Chethana Bolanthakodi  2 , Prema D'Cunha  2 , Mudiki Bheema Bai  1 , Ashok Kumar Moharana  3 , Deepak Ts  3
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Clinical equivalence of Trusynth fast ® and Vicryl rapide ® polyglactin 910 fast absorbing sutures on maternal morbidity experienced by women following episiotomy repair: a single-blind, randomized study

Dongabanti Hemalatha Devi et al. F1000Res. .

Abstract

Background: Episiotomy procedure enlarges the vaginal outlet to facilitate childbirth. Polyglactin 910 fast-absorbing sutures are widely used for the repair of episiotomy because of their rapid absorption and less inflammatory response. This study was designed for subjective assessment of perineal pain post-episiotomy repair, with Trusynth Fast ® and Vicryl Rapide ® polyglactin 910 fast-absorbing sutures. Method: This was a single-blind, randomized, prospective study conducted between January 7, 2021 and July 14, 2021 across two centers in India. Primiparous or multiparous women (18-40 years), who required episiotomy during vaginal delivery were included, and either Trusynth Fast ® (n=47) or Vicryl Rapide ® (n=49) suture was used for their episiotomy repair. The primary endpoint, perineal pain was assessed with visual analogue scale at all follow-up visits. The secondary endpoints, quantity of local anesthesia, number of sutures used, time to repair episiotomy, intraoperative suture handling, analgesics used, early and late wound complications, wound re-suturing, time to complete healing, presence of residual sutures, return to sexual activity, dyspareunia, and adverse events were also recorded. Results: The study showed no significant difference in perineal pain between the two groups at any visit. A statistically significant difference (p<0.05) in total score of episiotomy healing scale on day 2 (0.13±0.34 versus 0.35±0.56) and swelling on day 2 (8.51 versusversus 28.57%) was noted between Trusynth Fast ® and Vicryl Rapide ® group. Non-significant difference was observed between the groups regarding anesthesia, number of sutures, time to repair episiotomy, intraoperative suture handling, analgesics, puerperal fever, wound infection, dehiscence, hematoma, urinary incontinence, re-suturing, time to complete healing, return to sexual activity and dyspareunia. Conclusion: Trusynth Fast ® suture is clinically equivalent to Vicryl Rapide ® suture and can be used for episiotomy repair with minimal risk of perineal pain and wound complications. Clinical Trials Registry of India Registration: CTRI/2020/12/029925; Registered on December 18, 2020.

Keywords: Episiotomy healing scale; Episiotomy repair; Perineal pain; Polyglactin 910 fast absorbable suture; Vaginal delivery; Wound complications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: Authors AKM and DTS are the employees of Healthium Medtech Limited, India who are manufacturers of Trusynth fast suture. Author DHD, CB, PD and MBB declares no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. CONSORT flow diagram of the study participants and the study design.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Post-operative profile of the subjects randomized to Trusynth Fast ® (n=47) and Vicryl Rapide ® (n=49) groups: (a) Mean pain score was evaluated using visual analogue scale (VAS) scale, (b) Frequency of subjects with no pain, (c) Mean total score of episiotomy healing scale, and (d) Percentage of score of Episiotomy Healing Scale or REEDA scale.
hr: Hours, p<0.05 is statistically significant.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Intraoperative suture handling characteristics in subjects randomized to Trusynth Fast ® (n=47) and Vicryl Rapide ® (n=49) groups: Percentage scores for “excellent”, “very good”, “good” and “fair” are shown in one bar for different suture handling characteristics.
None of the characteristics had “poor” score.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Singh S, Thakur T, Chandhiok N, et al. : Pattern of episiotomy use & its immediate complications among vaginal deliveries in 18 tertiary care hospitals in India. Indian J. Med. Res. 2016;143:474–480. 10.4103/0971-5916.184304 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ononuju C, Ogu R, Nyengidiki T, et al. : Review of episiotomy and the effect of its risk factors on postepisiotomy complications at the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital. Niger Med. J. 2020;61:96–101. 10.4103/nmj.nmj_121_19 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aguiar M, Farley A, Hope L, et al. : Birth-Related Perineal Trauma in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Matern. Child Health J. 2019;23:1048–1070. 10.1007/s10995-019-02732-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thukral P, Mendiratta S, Bhola G: A comparative study of subcuticular and interrupted stitches for episiotomy. Int. J. Reprod. Contraception, Obstet. Gynecol. 2018;7(5107):5107. 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20184976 - DOI
    1. Perumal D, Selvaraju D: Comparative study of episiotomy repair: absorbable synthetic versus chromic catgut suture material. Int. J. Reprod. Contraception, Obstet. Gynecol. 2017;6:2186. 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20172042 - DOI

Publication types

Substances