Normothermic Machine Perfusion of Donor Livers for Transplantation in the United States: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- PMID: 37389552
- DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005934
Normothermic Machine Perfusion of Donor Livers for Transplantation in the United States: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Objective: To compare conventional low-temperature storage of transplant donor livers [static cold storage (SCS)] with storage of the organs at physiological body temperature [normothermic machine perfusion (NMP)].
Background: The high success rate of liver transplantation is constrained by the shortage of transplantable organs (eg, waiting list mortality >20% in many centers). NMP maintains the liver in a functioning state to improve preservation quality and enable testing of the organ before transplantation. This is of greatest potential value with organs from brain-dead donor organs (DBD) with risk factors (age and comorbidities), and those from donors declared dead by cardiovascular criteria (donation after circulatory death).
Methods: Three hundred eighty-three donor organs were randomized by 15 US liver transplant centers to undergo NMP (n = 192) or SCS (n = 191). Two hundred sixty-six donor livers proceeded to transplantation (NMP: n = 136; SCS: n = 130). The primary endpoint of the study was "early allograft dysfunction" (EAD), a marker of early posttransplant liver injury and function.
Results: The difference in the incidence of EAD did not achieve significance, with 20.6% (NMP) versus 23.7% (SCS). Using exploratory, "as-treated" rather than "intent-to-treat," subgroup analyses, there was a greater effect size in donation after circulatory death donor livers (22.8% NMP vs 44.6% SCS) and in organs in the highest risk quartile by donor risk (19.2% NMP vs 33.3% SCS). The incidence of acute cardiovascular decompensation at organ reperfusion, "postreperfusion syndrome," as a secondary outcome was reduced in the NMP arm (5.9% vs 14.6%).
Conclusions: NMP did not lower EAD, perhaps related to the inclusion of lower-risk liver donors, as higher-risk donor livers seemed to benefit more. The technology is safe in standard organ recovery and seems to have the greatest benefit for marginal donors.
Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
C.C., C.M., L.R., and P.F.: are employed by Organox. The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest.
Comment in
-
Continuous normothermic machine perfusion of donor livers in the United States: the challenging road from the trial-world into the real-world.Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2024 Dec 1;13(6):1022-1026. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-24-521. Epub 2024 Nov 20. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2024. PMID: 39669090 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Kwong AJ, Ebel NH, Kim WR, et al. OPTN/SRTR 2020 annual data report: liver. Am J Transplant. 2022;(suppl 2):204–309.
-
- Schön MR, Kollmar O, Wolf S, et al. Liver transplantation after organ preservation with normothermic extracorporeal perfusion. Ann Surg. 2001;233:114–123.
-
- Brockmann J, Reddy S, Coussios C, et al. Normothermic perfusion: a new paradigm for organ preservation. Ann Surg. 2009;250:1–6.
-
- Lozanovski VJ, Döhler B, Weiss KH, et al. The differential influence of cold ischemia time on outcome after liver transplantation for different indications—who Is at risk? A Collaborative Transplant Study report. Front Immunol. 2020;11:892.
-
- Watson CJE, Gaurav R, Fear C, et al. Predicting early allograft function after normothermic machine perfusion. Transplantation. 2022;106:2391–2398.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical