Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2023 Sep;40(9):3937-3955.
doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02565-3. Epub 2023 Jun 30.

Efficacy and Safety of Pirfenidone in Advanced Versus Non-Advanced Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Post-Hoc Analysis of Six Clinical Studies

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Efficacy and Safety of Pirfenidone in Advanced Versus Non-Advanced Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Post-Hoc Analysis of Six Clinical Studies

Jürgen Behr et al. Adv Ther. 2023 Sep.

Abstract

Introduction: In the European Union (EU), the indication for the antifibrotic pirfenidone prior to April 2023 did not include patients with advanced idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). This analysis compared the efficacy and safety of pirfenidone in advanced IPF versus non-advanced IPF.

Methods: Data were included from the following studies of pirfenidone: ASCEND (NCT01366209); CAPACITY (004 [NCT00287716] and 006 [NCT00287729]); RECAP (NCT00662038; advanced IPF defined as percent predicted forced vital capacity [%FVC] < 50% and/or percent predicted carbon monoxide diffusing capacity [%DLco] < 35% at baseline); PASSPORT (NCT02699879; advanced IPF defined as baseline %FVC < 50%); and SP-IPF (NCT02951429; patients with advanced IPF [defined as %DLco ≤ 40% at screening] at risk of group 3 pulmonary hypertension).

Results: In the pooled ASCEND/CAPACITY studies, the annual mean rate of FVC decline from baseline to Week 52 was significantly lower for pirfenidone versus placebo in advanced (p = 0.0035) and non-advanced IPF (p = 0.0001). Rate of all-cause mortality over 52 weeks was numerically lower for pirfenidone versus placebo in advanced and non-advanced IPF. In RECAP, the mean annual rate of FVC decline from baseline to Week 180 of pirfenidone treatment was similar in patients with advanced (- 141.5 mL) and non-advanced IPF (- 153.5 mL). In SP-IPF, the mean annual rate of FVC decline and rate of all-cause mortality from baseline to Week 52 in patients treated with placebo + pirfenidone were - 93.0 mL and 20.2%, respectively. No new safety signals were identified, and the safety profile of pirfenidone in patients with advanced IPF was generally consistent with that of non-advanced IPF.

Conclusions: These results highlight the benefit of pirfenidone treatment in patients with advanced and non-advanced IPF. As such, the indication for pirfenidone in the EU has now been updated to include the treatment of adult patients with advanced IPF.

Trial registrations: ASCEND (NCT01366209), CAPACITY 004 (NCT00287716), CAPACITY 006 (NCT00287729), RECAP (NCT00662038), PASSPORT (NCT02699879), and SP-IPF (NCT02951429).

Keywords: Advanced idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; Non-advanced idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; Pirfenidone.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Jürgen Behr reports sponsorship or research funds from BMBF, DFG, and LMU-KUM, and has received payment or other financial remuneration from Actelion, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd., Ferrer, Galapagos, MSD, Novartis, and Promedior, Inc. (acquired by Roche in February 2020). Carlo Albera has served as a consultant for, and received speakers’ bureau fees from, Boehringer Ingelheim, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, and FibroGen. Ulrich Costabel reports personal fees as a consultant or speaker from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd./Genentech, Inc., FibroGen, Galapagos, Novartis, and Pliant Therapeutics. Marilyn K. Glassberg receives research funding from, and has served on advisory boards for, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Esperion Therapeutics, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd./Genentech, Inc., Redx Pharma, and Surrozen, and has served on a steering committee for Bellerophon. Harold Haller Jr has served as a consultant or speaker for Boehringer Ingelheim, Mylan Specialties, and United Therapeutics, and has served as an investigator for Boehringer Ingelheim and United Therapeutics. Steven D. Nathan has served as a consultant for, received speakers’ bureau fees from, and received research funding from Bellerophon, Boehringer Ingelheim, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd., Galapagos, and United Therapeutics. Wim A. Wuyts reports grants paid to his institution by Boehringer Ingelheim, F. Hoffman-La Roche, Ltd., and Galapagos. Lisa Lancaster has served as a consultant for AstraZeneca, Bellerophon Therapeutics, Daewoong Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, DevPro Biopharma, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd., Nashville Biosciences, Oxygenium, Pieris Pharmaceuticals, Senwha Biosciences, United Therapeutics and Veracyte; has served as a researcher for Boehringer Ingelheim, Bridge Biosciences, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, CSL Behring, Fibrogen, Galecto Biotech, Genentech, Inc., Horizon Therapeutics, NeRRe Therapeutics, Novartis, and Pliant Therapeutics; and has been involved in disease state education with Boehringer Ingelheim, United Therapeutics, and Veractye. Giuseppe Alvaro, Frank Gilberg, and Katerina Samara are employees of F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of the studies and patient populations included in the post-hoc analysis. No imputation was performed for missing data. aEfficacy data were pooled for the ASCEND and CAPACITY studies. The RECAP and SP-IPF studies were analyzed separately. bAssessment at 12 months was chosen for the pooled ASCEND/CAPACITY population since this is the duration of ASCEND for which data were available to be pooled with data from CAPACITY. cThe pooled safety population included data from ASCEND, CAPACITY, RECAP, and SP-IPF. Data from PASSPORT were analyzed separately. dExposure-adjusted data were used for this analysis to account for the differences in study duration and follow-up. 6MWD 6-min walk distance; FVC forced vital capacity, IPF idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, OLE open-label extension, TEAE treatment-emergent adverse event
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
OS in the pooled ASCEND/CAPACITY studies. A Advanced IPF and B non-advanced IPF (efficacy population). CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio, IPF idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, OS overall survival
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
TEAEs by SOC. A Pirfenidone treatment-naïve patients and B pirfenidone pre-treated patients (pooled safety population [ASCEND, CAPACITY, RECAP, and SP-IPF]). IPF idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, SOC system organ class, TEAE treatment-emergent adverse event

References

    1. Ley B, Collard HR, King TE., Jr Clinical course and prediction of survival in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183(4):431–440. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201006-0894CI. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kaunisto J, Salomaa E-R, Hodgson U, et al. Demographics and survival of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in the FinnishIPF registry. ERJ Open Res. 2019;5(3):00170–2018. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00170-2018. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Raghu G, Remy-Jardin M, Richeldi L, et al. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (an update) and progressive pulmonary fibrosis in adults: an official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022;205(9):e18–e47. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202202-0399ST. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kolb M, Collard HR. Staging of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: past, present and future. Eur Respir Rev. 2014;23(132):220–224. doi: 10.1183/09059180.00002114. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Martinez FJ, Safrin S, Weycker D, et al. The clinical course of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(12 Pt 1):963–967. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-12_Part_1-200506210-00005. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data