Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 30;23(1):434.
doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03180-y.

Comparison of three different biomaterials used in in vitro molar apexification models

Affiliations

Comparison of three different biomaterials used in in vitro molar apexification models

Elif Ece Kalaoglu et al. BMC Oral Health. .

Abstract

Objectives: New biomaterials had some advantages such as mixing and easier application as compared to traditional MTA in single step apexification method. This study aimed to compare the three biomaterials used in the apexification treatment of immature molar teeth in terms of the time spent, the quality of the canal filling and the number of x-rays taken to complete the process.

Methods: The root canals of the extracted thirty molar teeth were shaped with rotary tools. To obtain the apexification model, ProTaper F3 was used retrograde. The teeth were randomly assigned into three groups based on the material used to seal the apex; Group 1: Pro Root MTA, Group 2: MTA Flow, Group 3: Biodentine. The amounts of the filling, the number of radiographs taken until treatment completion and the treatment duration were recorded. Then teeth were fixed for micro computed tomography imaging for quality evaluation of canal filling.

Results: Biodentine was superior to the other filling materials according to time. MTA Flow provided greater filling volume than the other filling materials in the rank comparison for the mesiobuccal canals. MTA Flow had greater filling volume than ProRoot MTA in the palatinal/distal canals(p = 0.039). Biodentine had greater filling volume more than MTA Flow in the mesiolingual/distobuccal canals (p = 0.049).

Conclusions: MTA Flow was found as a suitable biomaterial according to the treatment time and quality of root canal fillings.

Keywords: Apexification; Biodentine; MTA; MTA Flow; Multi-rooted teeth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Micro-CT images of Group 1; ProRoot MTA, Group 2; MTA Flow, Group 3; Biodentine

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Musale PK, Kothare S. Non-surgical endodontic management of immature permanent mandibular first molar: a 3 year follow-up. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018;19(5):373–7. doi: 10.1007/s40368-018-0350-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Escribano-Escriva B, Mico-Munoz P, Manzano-Saiz A, Giner-Lluesma T, Collado-Castellanos N, Muwaquet-Rodriguez S. MTA apical barrier: In vitro study of the use of ultrasonic vibration. J Clin Exp Dent [Internet]. 2016;0–0. Available from: http://www.medicinaoral.com/medoralfree01/aop/53085.pdf. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alhaddad Alhamoui F, Steffen H, Splieth C. The sealing ability of ProRoot MTA when placed as an apical barrier using three different techniques: an in-vitro apexification model. Quintessence Int. 2014;45(10):821–827. - PubMed
    1. Moore A, Howley MF, O’Connell AC. Treatment of open apex teeth using two types of white mineral trioxide aggregate after initial dressing with calcium hydroxide in children. Dent Traumatol. 2011;27(3):166–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2011.00984.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stefopoulos S, Tsatsas DV, Kerezoudis NP, Eliades G. Comparative in vitro study of the sealing efficiency of white vs grey ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate formulas as apical barriers. Dent Traumatol. 2008;24(2):207–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2007.00516.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources