Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jun 30;23(1):1271.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15937-9.

A review of reviews exploring patient and public involvement in population health research and development of tools containing best practice guidance

Soo Vinnicombe  1 , Mayara S Bianchim  1 , Jane Noyes  2
Affiliations
Review

A review of reviews exploring patient and public involvement in population health research and development of tools containing best practice guidance

Soo Vinnicombe et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: Patient and public involvement (PPI) is increasingly seen as something that is integral to research and of importance to research funders. There is general recognition that PPI is the right thing to do for both moral and practical reasons. The aim of this review of reviews is to examine how PPI can be done 'properly' by looking at the evidence that exists from published reviews and assessing it against the UK Standards for Public Involvement in Research, as well as examining the specific features of population health research that can make PPI more challenging.

Methods: A review of reviews and development of best practice guidance was carried out following the 5-stage Framework Synthesis method.

Results: In total 31 reviews were included. There is a lack of current research or clarity around Governance and Impact when findings are mapped against UK Standards for Public Involvement in Research. It was also clear that there is little knowledge around PPI with under-represented groups. There are gaps in knowledge about how to ensure key specific attributes of population health research are addressed for PPI team members - particularly around how to deal with complexity and the data-driven nature of the research. Four tools were produced for researchers and PPI members to further improve their PPI activity within population health research and health research more generally, including a framework of recommended actions to address PPI in population health research, and guidance on integrating PPI based on the UK Standards for Public Involvement in Research.

Conclusions: Facilitating PPI in population health research is challenging due to the nature of this type of research and there is far less evidence on how to do PPI well in this context. The tools can help researchers identify key aspects of PPI that can be integrated when designing PPI within projects. Findings also highlight specific areas where more research or discussion is needed.

Keywords: Guidance; Involvement; PPI; Population health research; Public and patient involvement; Review of reviews.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA Flow Diagram. * This number is incomplete due to missing information on some papers. Duplicates have been removed (original n = 1222)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. What is public involvement in research? Health Research Authority. 2020 Dec 16 [cited 2021 April 15]. Available from: https://www.hra.nhs.uk/planning-and-improving-research/best-practice/pub....
    1. Minogue V, Cooke M, Donskoy A-L, Vicary P, Wells B. Patient and public involvement in reducing health and care research waste. Res Involv Engagem. 2018;4(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0087-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Public involvement in a pandemic. Lessons from the UK Covid-19 public involvement matching service. Health Research Authority. 2021 Nov 26 [cited 2023 April 14]. Available from: https://www.hra.nhs.uk/planning-and-improving-research/best-practice/pub....
    1. The UK Standards. : Setting the scene. UK Standards for Public Involvement. [cited 2021 April 09]. Available from: https://sites.google.com/nihr.ac.uk/pi-standards/standards/setting-the-s....
    1. Mc Laughlin L, Williams G, Roberts G, et al. Assessing the efficacy of coproduction to better understand the barriers to achieving sustainability in NHS chronic kidney services and create alternate pathways. Health Expect. 2022;25(2):579–606. doi: 10.1111/hex.13391. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources