Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2023 Aug;12(16):16829-16836.
doi: 10.1002/cam4.6304. Epub 2023 Jul 1.

Misuse of tumor marker levels leads to an insufficient International Germ Cell Consensus Classification (IGCCCG) risk group assignment and impaired treatment

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Misuse of tumor marker levels leads to an insufficient International Germ Cell Consensus Classification (IGCCCG) risk group assignment and impaired treatment

Matthäus Majewski et al. Cancer Med. 2023 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Metastatic germ cell tumors of the testis (GCTs) are risk-stratified according to the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) classification system. This risk classification is based on anatomical risk factors as well as tumor marker levels of AFP, HCG, and LDH assessed pre-chemotherapy after orchiectomy treatment. An incorrect classification is possible when pre-orchiectomy marker levels are used, possibly resulting in over- or undertreatment of patients. The aim was to investigate the potential frequency and clinical relevance of incorrect risk stratification using pre-orchiectomy tumor marker levels.

Methods: A multicenter registry analysis, including patients with metastasized nonseminomatous GCT (NSGCT), was conducted by investigators of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group (GTCSG). Based on the marker levels at different timepoints, IGCCCG risk groups were calculated. The agreement was tested using Cohen's kappa.

Results: A total of 672 of 1910 (35%) patients were diagnosed with metastatic NSGCTs, and 523 (78%) had sufficient data for 224 follow-up data points. By using pre-orchiectomy tumor marker levels, 106 patients (20%) would have been incorrectly classified. Seventy-two patients (14%) were classified into a higher risk category, and 34 patients (7%) were classified into a lower risk category. Cohen's kappa was 0.69 (p < 0.001), showing a strong agreement between the use of both marker timepoints. The treatment of misclassified patients would have resulted in an overtreatment of 72 patients or undertreatment of 34 patients.

Conclusions: The use of pre-orchiectomy tumor marker levels may lead to an incorrect risk classification and might subsequently lead to under- or overtreatment of patients.

Keywords: AFP; IGCCCG; LDH; NSGCT; hCG; metastasis; serum tumor marker; testicular germ cell tumor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
CONSORT diagram for patient selection.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Therapeutic consequences using pre‐orchiectomy instead of pre‐chemotherapy marker levels. BEP, bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin. Figure displaying the total number and resulting consequence of using pre‐orchiectomy instead of pre‐chemotherapy markers. Definite overtherapy is displayed in orange, possible overtherapy is showed in pale orange. Definite undertherapy is displayed in blue, possible undertherapy is showed in pale blue. BEP = Bleomycin (B), Etoposid (E) and Cisplatin (P).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Marker responsible for changes in the IGCCCG risk group. Venn diagram visualizing the causal markers for the change in IGCCCG risk group classification. AFP, alpha‐fetoprotein, hCG, human chorionic gonadotropin, LDH, lactate dehydrogenase.

References

    1. Beyer J, Albers P, Altena R, et al. Maintaining success, reducing treatment burden, focusing on survivorship: Highlights from the Third European Consensus Conference on Diagnosis and Treatment of Germ‐Cell Cancer. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:878‐888. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds579 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Daugaard G, Gundgaard MG, Mortensen MS, et al. Surveillance for stage I nonseminoma testicular cancer: outcomes and long‐term follow‐up in a population‐based cohort. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:3817‐3823. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.5831 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mead GM, Stenning SP. The International Germ Cell Consensus Classification: A New Prognostic Factor‐Based Staging Classification for Metastatic Germ Cell Tumours. Clin Oncol. 1997;9(4):207‐209. doi: 10.1016/S0936-6555(97)80001-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Laguna M, Albers P, Algaba F, et al. EAU guidelines on testicular cancer. Eur Assoc Urol. 2022:1–66. https://uroweb.org/guideline/testicular‐cancer/
    1. Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie: Hodentumoren. Accessed december 30, 2022. https://www.leitlinienprogramm‐onkologie.de/leitlinien/hodentumoren/

Publication types

Substances