Update on the clinical use of trabecular bone score (TBS) in the management of osteoporosis: results of an expert group meeting organized by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO), and the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) under the auspices of WHO Collaborating Center for Epidemiology of Musculoskeletal Health and Aging
- PMID: 37393412
- PMCID: PMC10427549
- DOI: 10.1007/s00198-023-06817-4
Update on the clinical use of trabecular bone score (TBS) in the management of osteoporosis: results of an expert group meeting organized by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO), and the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) under the auspices of WHO Collaborating Center for Epidemiology of Musculoskeletal Health and Aging
Abstract
Purpose: Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a grey-level textural measurement acquired from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry lumbar spine images and is a validated index of bone microarchitecture. In 2015, a Working Group of the European Society on Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO) published a review of the TBS literature, concluding that TBS predicts hip and major osteoporotic fracture, at least partly independent of bone mineral density (BMD) and clinical risk factors. It was also concluded that TBS is potentially amenable to change as a result of pharmacological therapy. Further evidence on the utility of TBS has since accumulated in both primary and secondary osteoporosis, and the introduction of FRAX and BMD T-score adjustment for TBS has accelerated adoption. This position paper therefore presents a review of the updated scientific literature and provides expert consensus statements and corresponding operational guidelines for the use of TBS.
Methods: An Expert Working Group was convened by the ESCEO and a systematic review of the evidence undertaken, with defined search strategies for four key topics with respect to the potential use of TBS: (1) fracture prediction in men and women; (2) initiating and monitoring treatment in postmenopausal osteoporosis; (3) fracture prediction in secondary osteoporosis; and (4) treatment monitoring in secondary osteoporosis. Statements to guide the clinical use of TBS were derived from the review and graded by consensus using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.
Results: A total of 96 articles were reviewed and included data on the use of TBS for fracture prediction in men and women, from over 20 countries. The updated evidence shows that TBS enhances fracture risk prediction in both primary and secondary osteoporosis, and can, when taken with BMD and clinical risk factors, inform treatment initiation and the choice of antiosteoporosis treatment. Evidence also indicates that TBS provides useful adjunctive information in monitoring treatment with long-term denosumab and anabolic agents. All expert consensus statements were voted as strongly recommended.
Conclusion: The addition of TBS assessment to FRAX and/or BMD enhances fracture risk prediction in primary and secondary osteoporosis, adding useful information for treatment decision-making and monitoring. The expert consensus statements provided in this paper can be used to guide the integration of TBS in clinical practice for the assessment and management of osteoporosis. An example of an operational approach is provided in the appendix. This position paper presents an up-to-date review of the evidence base, synthesised through expert consensus statements, which informs the implementation of Trabecular Bone Score in clinical practice.
Keywords: Fracture; Guidelines; Osteoporosis; TBS; Trabecular bone score.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
J.Y.R. has received fees for lectures or advisory boards from IBSA-Genevrier, Mylan, Radius Health, Pierre Fabre, Faes Pharma, Rejuvinate Biomed, Teva, Theramex, Pfizer, Mithra Pharmaceuticals, CNIEL, Dairy Research Council, Nutricia, Danone and Agnovos, and industry grants (all through institution) from IBSA-Genevrier, Mylan, CNIEL, Radius Health and TRB, outside the submitted work.
C.C. reports personal fees from ABBH, Amgen, Eli Lilly, GSK, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Servier and Takeda, outside the submitted work.
N.C.H. reports personal fees, consultancy, lecture fees and honoraria from Alliance for Better Bone Health, AMGEN, MSD, Eli Lilly, UCB, Kyowa Kirin, Servier, Shire, Theramex, Consilient Healthcare and Internis Pharma, outside the submitted work.
L.K. reports lecture fees and honoraria from Alexion, Amgen, Ascendis, Medimaps (2 single presentations), and Radius, outside the submitted work.
E.V.M reports consultancy, advisory boards and or lecture fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Consilient Healthcare, Fresenius Kabi, GSK, Hologic, Internis, Lilly, ObsEva, Pfizer, UCB. Additional research support from Versus Arthritis, I3 Innovus, MRC and IOF.
N.V. reports personal fees from IBSA, Mylan, Viatris, Fidia, MSD outside of the submitted work.
N.A-D., D.M.C., M.C., A-L.D., O.L., D.M., J.P., M-P.L., S.T. declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Use of Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) as a Complementary Approach to Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) for Fracture Risk Assessment in Clinical Practice.J Clin Densitom. 2017 Jul-Sep;20(3):334-345. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2017.06.019. Epub 2017 Jul 19. J Clin Densitom. 2017. PMID: 28734710 Review.
-
Trabecular bone score (TBS) as a new complementary approach for osteoporosis evaluation in clinical practice.Bone. 2015 Sep;78:216-24. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.05.016. Epub 2015 May 16. Bone. 2015. PMID: 25988660 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Risk-equivalent T-score adjustment for using lumbar spine trabecular bone score (TBS): the Manitoba BMD registry.Osteoporos Int. 2018 Mar;29(3):751-758. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4405-0. Epub 2018 Feb 1. Osteoporos Int. 2018. PMID: 29392355 Free PMC article.
-
Preoperative bone health assessment and optimization in spine surgery.Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Aug;49(2):E2. doi: 10.3171/2020.5.FOCUS20255. Neurosurg Focus. 2020. PMID: 32738805
-
Update on trabecular bone score.Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2022 Nov 11;66(5):694-706. doi: 10.20945/2359-3997000000559. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2022. PMID: 36382759 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The association between dairy and bone quality in Puerto Rican adults varies by dairy food and fat content.JBMR Plus. 2025 May 28;9(8):ziaf094. doi: 10.1093/jbmrpl/ziaf094. eCollection 2025 Aug. JBMR Plus. 2025. PMID: 40689107 Free PMC article.
-
L-shaped association of the non-high-density lipoprotein to high-density lipoprotein ratio with low bone mass disorders.Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 5;15(1):28583. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12806-w. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40764703 Free PMC article.
-
The Fracture Phenotypes in Women and Men of 50 Years and Older with a Recent Clinical Fracture.Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2024 Dec;22(6):611-620. doi: 10.1007/s11914-024-00885-z. Epub 2024 Sep 10. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2024. PMID: 39254815 Review.
-
Osteoporosis in axial radiographic spondyloarthritis: diagnostic limitations of bone mineral density and the need for comprehensive fracture risk assessment.Reumatologia. 2024;62(6):466-474. doi: 10.5114/reum/194107. Epub 2024 Dec 24. Reumatologia. 2024. PMID: 39866305 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evidence-Based Guideline for the management of osteoporosis in men.Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2024 Apr;20(4):241-251. doi: 10.1038/s41584-024-01094-9. Epub 2024 Mar 14. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2024. PMID: 38485753 Review.
References
-
- Siris ES, Miller PD, Barrett-Connor E, Faulkner KG, Wehren LE, Abbott TA, Berger ML, Santora AC, Sherwood LM. Identification and fracture outcomes of undiagnosed low bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: results from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment. JAMA. 2001;286(22):2815–2822. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.22.2815. - DOI - PubMed