Management of early pregnancy loss among obstetrician-gynecologists in Massachusetts and barriers to mifepristone use
- PMID: 37394110
- DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110108
Management of early pregnancy loss among obstetrician-gynecologists in Massachusetts and barriers to mifepristone use
Abstract
Objectives: To measure the prevalence of early pregnancy loss management types among obstetrician-gynecologists in Massachusetts, and delineate barriers, facilitators, demographic and practice-related factors associated with mifepristone use for early pregnancy loss.
Study design: We surveyed a census of obstetrician-gynecologists in Massachusetts. Descriptive statistics measured the prevalence of offering expectant, misoprostol-alone, mifepristone and misoprostol, dilation and curettage in the office and operating room, and multivariate logistic regression analysis evaluated barriers and facilitators to mifepristone use. Data were weighted to account for nonresponders.
Results: 198 obstetrician-gynecologists responded to the survey (response rate=29%). Participants most commonly offered expectant management (98%), dilation and curettage in the operating room (94%), and misoprostol-only medication management (80%). Fewer offered mifepristone-misoprostol (51%) or dilation and curettage in an office setting (45%). Those in private practice or other practice types had lower odds of offering mifepristone-misoprostol than those in academic practice (private practice: aOR 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.19, 0.61]). Female physicians had higher odds of offering mifepristone-misoprostol (aOR 1.97, 95% CI [1.11, 3.49]). Obstetrician-gynecologists who included medication abortion in their practice had much higher odds of using mifepristone for early pregnancy loss (aOR 25.06, 95% CI [14.52, 43.24]). The Food and Drug Administration Risk and Evaluation Management Strategies Program was a primary barrier among those not using mifepristone (54%).
Conclusions: Many obstetrician-gynecologists do not offer mifepristone-based regimens for early pregnancy loss, which are more efficacious than misoprostol-only regimens. The Food and Drug Administration Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies Program is a major barrier to mifepristone use.
Implications: Half of obstetrician-gynecologists in Massachusetts do not use mifepristone for early pregnancy loss management. Major barriers include lack of experience with mifepristone and the Food and Drug Administration Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies Program regulations. Removing medically unnecessary regulations and increasing education on mifepristone via access to abortion care experts may increase uptake of this practice.
Keywords: Abortion; Food and Drug Administration (FDA); Manual vacuum aspiration; Miscarriage; Misoprostol; Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies Program (REMS).
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Mifepristone Use Among Obstetrician-Gynecologists in Massachusetts: Prevalence and Predictors of Use.Womens Health Issues. 2024 Mar-Apr;34(2):135-141. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2023.11.007. Epub 2023 Dec 20. Womens Health Issues. 2024. PMID: 38129219
-
Mifepristone use for early pregnancy loss: A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators among OB/GYNS in Massachusetts, USA.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2023 Sep;55(3):210-217. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12237. Epub 2023 Jul 2. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2023. PMID: 37394759
-
Comparison of Early Pregnancy Loss Management Between States With Restrictive and Supportive Abortion Policies.Womens Health Issues. 2023 Mar-Apr;33(2):126-132. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2022.10.001. Epub 2022 Nov 12. Womens Health Issues. 2023. PMID: 36379879
-
Elective abortion: Clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Mar;222:95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.01.017. Epub 2018 Jan 31. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018. PMID: 29408754 Review.
-
Early pregnancy loss medical management in clinical practice.Contraception. 2023 Oct;126:110134. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110134. Epub 2023 Jul 29. Contraception. 2023. PMID: 37524147 Review.
Cited by
-
Spatial Disparities in Mifepristone Use for Early Miscarriage and Induced Abortion Among Obstetrician-Gynecologists Practicing in Massachusetts.Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2024 Oct 4;5(1):765-774. doi: 10.1089/whr.2024.0085. eCollection 2024. Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2024. PMID: 39439769 Free PMC article.
-
Ultrasound-guided manual vacuum aspiration (USG-MVA) with cervical preparation for early pregnancy loss: A cost-effectiveness analysis.PLoS One. 2023 Nov 3;18(11):e0294058. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294058. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37922290 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes After Early Pregnancy Loss Management With Mifepristone Plus Misoprostol vs Misoprostol Alone.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2435906. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.35906. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 39378038 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical