Mifepristone use for early pregnancy loss: A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators among OB/GYNS in Massachusetts, USA
- PMID: 37394759
- DOI: 10.1363/psrh.12237
Mifepristone use for early pregnancy loss: A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators among OB/GYNS in Massachusetts, USA
Abstract
Context: Early pregnancy loss (EPL) affects 1 million patients in the United States (US) annually, but integration of mifepristone into EPL care may be complicated by regulatory barriers, practice-related factors, and abortion stigma.
Methods: We conducted qualitative, semi-structured interviews among obstetrician-gynecologists in independent practice in Massachusetts, US on mifepristone use for EPL. We recruited participants via professional networks and purposively sampled for mifepristone use, practice type, time in practice, and geographic location within Massachusetts until we reached thematic saturation. We analyzed interviews using inductive and deductive coding under a thematic analysis framework to identify facilitators of and barriers to mifepristone use.
Results: We interviewed 19 obstetrician-gynecologists; 12 had used mifepristone for EPL and 7 had not. Participants were in private practice (n = 12), academic practice (n = 6), or worked at a federally qualified health center (n = 1). Seven had fellowship training, including four in complex family planning. The most common facilitators of mifepristone use for EPL were access to the expertise or protocols of local-regional experts, leadership from a "champion," prior experience with abortion care, and hospital capacity constraints during the COVID-19 pandemic. The most common barriers were related to the Mifepristone Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) Program imposed by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Additionally, mifepristone's affiliation with abortion was a barrier to its use in EPL for some obstetrician-gynecologists.
Conclusion: The FDA Mifepristone REMS Program presents substantial barriers to obstetrician-gynecologists incorporating mifepristone into their EPL care.
© 2023 University of Ottawa.
Similar articles
-
Management of early pregnancy loss among obstetrician-gynecologists in Massachusetts and barriers to mifepristone use.Contraception. 2023 Oct;126:110108. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110108. Epub 2023 Jun 30. Contraception. 2023. PMID: 37394110
-
Abortion Stigma as a Barrier to Mifepristone Use among Obstetrician-Gynecologists in Alabama for Early Pregnancy Loss.South Med J. 2024 Aug;117(8):504-509. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001717. South Med J. 2024. PMID: 39094802
-
US clinicians' perspectives on how mifepristone regulations affect access to medication abortion and early pregnancy loss care in primary care.Contraception. 2021 Jul;104(1):92-97. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.04.017. Epub 2021 Apr 25. Contraception. 2021. PMID: 33910031
-
Early pregnancy loss medical management in clinical practice.Contraception. 2023 Oct;126:110134. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110134. Epub 2023 Jul 29. Contraception. 2023. PMID: 37524147 Review.
-
Update on medication abortion.J Midwifery Womens Health. 2007 Jan-Feb;52(1):23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2006.10.006. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2007. PMID: 17207747 Review.
Cited by
-
Spatial Disparities in Mifepristone Use for Early Miscarriage and Induced Abortion Among Obstetrician-Gynecologists Practicing in Massachusetts.Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2024 Oct 4;5(1):765-774. doi: 10.1089/whr.2024.0085. eCollection 2024. Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2024. PMID: 39439769 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes After Early Pregnancy Loss Management With Mifepristone Plus Misoprostol vs Misoprostol Alone.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2435906. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.35906. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 39378038 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Ventura SJ, Curtin SC, Abma JC, Henshaw SK. Estimated pregnancy rates and rates of pregnancy outcomes for the United States, 1990-2008. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2012;60(7):1-21.
-
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology. ACOG practice bulletin No. 200: early pregnancy loss. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(5):e197-e207.
-
- Chu JJ, Devall AJ, Beeson LE, et al. Mifepristone and misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for the management of missed miscarriage (MifeMiso): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The Lancet. 2020;396(10253):770-778.
-
- Macnaughton H, Nothnagle M, Early J. Mifepristone and misoprostol for early pregnancy loss and medication abortion. Am Fam Physician. 2021;103(8):473-480.
-
- Schreiber CA, Creinin MD, Atrio J, Sonalkar S, Ratcliffe SJ, Barnhart KT. Mifepristone pretreatment for the medical management of early pregnancy loss. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(23):2161-2170.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous