Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) treated with omalizumab, dupilumab, or mepolizumab: A systematic review of the current knowledge towards an attempt to compare agents' efficacy
- PMID: 37394893
- DOI: 10.1002/alr.23234
Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) treated with omalizumab, dupilumab, or mepolizumab: A systematic review of the current knowledge towards an attempt to compare agents' efficacy
Abstract
Background: The heterogeneity of existing studies, along with the fact that there are no published head-to-head trials, are the main reasons for the lack of guidelines regarding the selection of the proper biologic in treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyps. The aim of this study is to summarize the current knowledge regarding the efficacy of omalizumab, dupilumab, and mepolizumab in CRS treatment. We also attempt to proceed to an indirect comparison of the agents and try to answer the tricky question: which agent to select and why?
Methods: An extensive search in English literature was conducted in PubMed/Medline, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Database/Library. Eligibility criteria included papers with full text published in English, adult population studies, clearly described intervention protocol, and documented primary and secondary outcomes.
Results: The studies included numbered 37. All agents provided significant improvement in polyp size, sinuses opacification, severity of symptoms, need for surgery and systemic corticosteroids use. Analysis of available systematic reviews, meta-analyses and indirect treatment comparison studies showed that dupilumab appeared to be the most beneficial agent, in terms of primary and secondary outcomes. However, these results are of relatively low level of evidence due to several methodological limitations.
Conclusions: Although the present analysis showed a moderate supremacy of dupilumab, there is still no evidence-based answer to the question "which biologic agent is the most effective in CRS treatment?" Improved statistical methodology, head-to-head trials, and real-life studies could lead to more robust conclusions, establishing the real role of the specific biologic agents.
Keywords: chronic rhinosinusitis; medical therapy of chronic rhinosinusitis; paranasal sinus disease.
© 2023 ARS-AAOA, LLC.
Similar articles
-
Systemic and topical antibiotics for chronic rhinosinusitis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 26;4(4):CD011994. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011994.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27113482 Free PMC article.
-
Short-course oral steroids alone for chronic rhinosinusitis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 26;4(4):CD011991. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011991.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27113367 Free PMC article.
-
Intranasal steroids versus placebo or no intervention for chronic rhinosinusitis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 26;4(4):CD011996. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011996.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27115217 Free PMC article.
-
Improvement in Smell Using Monoclonal Antibodies Among Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps: A Systematic Review.J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2023 Dec 14;33(6):419-430. doi: 10.18176/jiaci.0939. Epub 2023 Sep 4. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2023. PMID: 37669083
-
Different types of intranasal steroids for chronic rhinosinusitis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 26;4(4):CD011993. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011993.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27115215 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Switching biologics in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: A multicenter Canadian experience.Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2025 Feb;15(2):166-173. doi: 10.1002/alr.23466. Epub 2024 Oct 18. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2025. PMID: 39422074 Free PMC article.
-
Mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment of olfactory dysfunction in rhinosinusitis.Eur J Med Res. 2025 Jun 11;30(1):474. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02740-y. Eur J Med Res. 2025. PMID: 40500803 Free PMC article. Review.
-
LncRNA NEAT1 promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition in nasal polyp cells via the miR-199-3p/PAK4 axis.Front Immunol. 2025 Jun 30;16:1613179. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1613179. eCollection 2025. Front Immunol. 2025. PMID: 40661947 Free PMC article.
-
Advances in Biologic Therapies for Allergic Diseases: Current Trends, Emerging Agents, and Future Perspectives.J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 8;14(4):1079. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041079. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40004611 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Diagnosis and drug therapy of chronic rhinosinusitis].HNO. 2025 Jul;73(7):441-460. doi: 10.1007/s00106-025-01635-y. Epub 2025 Apr 16. HNO. 2025. PMID: 40237828 Free PMC article. German.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Grayson JW, Cavada M, Harvey RJ. Clinically relevant phenotypes in chronic rhinosinusitis. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;48(1):31.
-
- Fokkens WJ, , Lund VJ, Hopkins C, et al. European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2020. Rhinology. 2020;20(58, S29):1-464. .
-
- Vlaminck S, Acke F, Scadding GK, Lambrecht BN, Gevaert P. Pathophysiological and clinical aspects of chronic rhinosinusitis: current concepts front. Allergy. 2021;27(2):741788.
-
- Holgate ST, Djukanović R, Casale T, Bousquet J. Anti-immunoglobulin E treatment with omalizumab in allergic diseases: an update on anti-inflammatory activity and clinical efficacy. Clin Exp Allergy. 2005;35(4):408-416.
-
- Holgate S, Casale T, Wenzel S, Bousquet J, Deniz Y. Reisner C The anti-inflammatory effects of omalizumab confirm the central role of IgE in allergic inflammation. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005;115(3):459-465.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical