Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 3;38(1):183.
doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04481-y.

Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy outcomes in colon adenocarcinoma in the elderly population: a propensity-score matched analysis of the National Cancer Database

Felipe Pacheco  1 , Sarah Harris-Gendron  2 , Emmanuel Luciano  3 , Jad Zreik  2 , Mohamed K Kamel  4 , Wael A Solh  3
Affiliations

Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy outcomes in colon adenocarcinoma in the elderly population: a propensity-score matched analysis of the National Cancer Database

Felipe Pacheco et al. Int J Colorectal Dis. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Purpose: While robotic surgery is more costly and involves longer intra-operative time, it has a technical advantage over laparoscopic surgery. With our aging population, patients are being diagnosed with colon cancer at older ages. The aim of this study is to compare laparoscopic versus robotic colectomy short- and long-term outcomes in elderly patients diagnosed with colon cancer at a national level.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using the National Cancer Database. Subjects ≥ 80-years-old who were diagnosed with stage I to III colon adenocarcinoma and underwent a robotic or laparoscopic colectomy from 2010-2018 were included. The laparoscopic group was propensity-score matched in a 3:1 ratio to the robotic group with 9343 laparoscopic and 3116 robotic cases matched. The main outcomes evaluated were 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission rate, median survival, and length of stay.

Results: There was no significant difference in the 30-day readmission rate (OR = 1.1, CI = 0.94-1.29, p = 0.23) or 30-day mortality rate (OR = 1.05, CI = 0.86-1.28, p = 0.63) between both groups. Robotic surgery was associated with higher overall survival (42 vs 44.7 months, p < 0.001) using a Kaplan-Meier survival curve. Robotic surgery had a statistically significant shorter length of stay (6.4 vs. 5.9 days, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Robotic colectomies are associated with higher median survival rates and decrease in the length of hospital stay compared to laparoscopic colectomies in the elderly population.

Keywords: Colon cancer; Elderly; Laparoscopic surgery; Robotic surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Halabi WJ, Kang CY, Jafari MD, Nguyen VQ, Carmichael JC, Mills S, Stamos MJ, Pigazzi A (2013) Robotic-assisted Colorectal Surgery in the United States: A Nationwide Analysis of Trends and Outcomes. World J Surg 37(12):2782–2790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2024-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ielpo B, Duran H, Diaz E et al (2017) Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a comparative study of clinical outcomes and costs. Int J Colorectal Dis 32:1423–1429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2876-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Srinath H, Kim TJ, Mor IJ, Warner RE (2022) Robot-Assisted vs Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy in Octogenarians. J Am Med Dir Assoc 23(4):690–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2022.01.080 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Palomba G, Dinuzzi VP, Capuano M et al (2022) Robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery in elderly patients in terms of recovery time: a monocentric experience. J Robotic Surg 16:981–987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-021-01332-2 - DOI
    1. Tagliabue F, Burati M, Chiarelli M, Fumagalli L, Guttadauro A, Arborio E, De Simone M, Cioffi U (2020) Robotic vs laparoscopic right colectomy - the burden of age and comorbidity in perioperative outcomes: An observational study. World J Gastrointes Surg 12(6):287–297. https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v12.i6.287 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources