Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 14;8(25):22466-22485.
doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c00306. eCollection 2023 Jun 27.

Deep Insights into the Coupled Optoelectronic and Photovoltaic Analysis of Lead-Free CsSnI3 Perovskite-Based Solar Cell Using DFT Calculations and SCAPS-1D Simulations

Affiliations

Deep Insights into the Coupled Optoelectronic and Photovoltaic Analysis of Lead-Free CsSnI3 Perovskite-Based Solar Cell Using DFT Calculations and SCAPS-1D Simulations

M Khalid Hossain et al. ACS Omega. .

Abstract

CsSnI3 is considered to be a viable alternative to lead (Pb)-based perovskite solar cells (PSCs) due to its suitable optoelectronic properties. The photovoltaic (PV) potential of CsSnI3 has not yet been fully explored due to its inherent difficulties in realizing defect-free device construction owing to the nonoptimized alignment of the electron transport layer (ETL), hole transport layer (HTL), efficient device architecture, and stability issues. In this work, initially, the structural, optical, and electronic properties of the CsSnI3 perovskite absorber layer were evaluated using the CASTEP program within the framework of the density functional theory (DFT) approach. The band structure analysis revealed that CsSnI3 is a direct band gap semiconductor with a band gap of 0.95 eV, whose band edges are dominated by Sn 5s/5p electrons After performing the DFT analysis, we investigated the PV performance of a variety of CsSnI3-based solar cell configurations utilizing a one-dimensional solar cell capacitance simulator (SCAPS-1D) with different competent ETLs such as IGZO, WS2, CeO2, TiO2, ZnO, PCBM, and C60. Simulation results revealed that the device architecture comprising ITO/ETL/CsSnI3/CuI/Au exhibited better photoconversion efficiency among more than 70 different configurations. The effect of the variation in the absorber, ETL, and HTL thickness on PV performance was analyzed for the above-mentioned configuration thoroughly. Additionally, the impact of series and shunt resistance, operating temperature, capacitance, Mott-Schottky, generation, and recombination rate on the six superior configurations were evaluated. The J-V characteristics and the quantum efficiency plots for these devices are systematically investigated for in-depth analysis. Consequently, this extensive simulation with validation results established the true potential of CsSnI3 absorber with suitable ETLs including ZnO, IGZO, WS2, PCBM, CeO2, and C60 ETLs and CuI as HTL, paving a constructive research path for the photovoltaic industry to fabricate cost-effective, high-efficiency, and nontoxic CsSnI3 PSCs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Design configuration of the CsSnI3-based PSC, and (b) the optimized crystal structure of CsSnI3 perovskite.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Relaxed geometry, (b) band structure, (c–f) total and orbital density of states, (g) electronic charge density map, and (h) Fermi surface contour of CsSnI3 perovskite.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Calculated six optical functions ((a) dielectric function, (b) refractive index, (c) conductivity, (d) absorption, (e) reflectivity, and (f) loss function) of the CsSnI3 perovskite solar absorber.
Figure 4
Figure 4
EBD of CsSnI3-based PSC with CuI HTL, Au back contact, and different ETLs: (a) PCBM, (b) ZnO, (c) C60, (d) IGZO, (e) WS2, and (f) CeO2.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Variation of PV parameters (a) VOC (V), (b) JSC (mA/cm2), (c) FF (%), and (d) PCE (%) of the CsSnI3-based solar cell for the studied HTLs with Au as back contact and different ETLs.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Contour plots showing the change in VOC for CsSnI3-based structures with (a) PCBM, (b) ZnO, (c) C60, (d) IGZO, (e) WS2, and (f) CeO2 ETLs along with the simultaneous variation in ETL and absorber layer thicknesses.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Contour plots showing the change in JSC for CsSnI3-based structures with (a) PCBM, (b) ZnO, (c) C60, (d) IGZO, (e) WS2, and (f) CeO2 ETLs along with the simultaneous variation in ETL and absorber layer thicknesses.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Contour plots showing the change in FF for CsSnI3-based structures with (a) PCBM, (b) ZnO, (c) C60, (d) IGZO, (e) WS2, and (f) CeO2 ETLs along with the simultaneous variation in ETL and absorber layer thicknesses.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Contour plots showing the change in PCE for CsSnI3-based structures with (a) PCBM, (b) ZnO, (c) C60, (d) IGZO, (e) WS2, and (f) CeO2 ETLs along with the simultaneous variation in ETL and absorber layer thicknesses.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Effect of change of RS on PV parameters (a) VOC, (b) JSC, (c) FF, and (d) PCE with a constant RSH for different ETLs.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Effect of change of RSH on PV parameters (a) VOC, (b) JSC, (c) FF, and (d) PCE with constant RS for different ETLs.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Effect of change of temperature on PV parameters (a) VOC, (b) JSC, (c) FF, and (d) PCE for different ETLs.
Figure 13
Figure 13
(a) Capacitance and Mott–Schottky (1/C2) plot for the CsSnI3-based perovskite solar cell having different ETLs (a) CeO2 (b) C60, (c) IGZO, (d) PCBM, (e) WS2, and (f) ZnO.
Figure 14
Figure 14
(a) Generation rate and (b) recombination rate for absorber CsSnI3-based structures with six different ETLs.
Figure 15
Figure 15
(a) J–V curve for six studied structures of ITO/ETL/CsSnI3/CuI/Au; (b) QE curve for the structure of ITO/ETL/CsSnI3/CuI/Au.

References

    1. Ye T.; Wang K.; Hou Y.; Yang D.; Smith N.; Magill B.; Yoon J.; Mudiyanselage R. R. H. H.; Khodaparast G. A.; Wang K.; Priya S. Ambient-Air-Stable Lead-Free CsSnI3 Solar Cells with Greater than 7.5% Efficiency. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 4319–4328. 10.1021/jacs.0c13069. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stranks S. D.; Snaith H. J. Metal-Halide Perovskites for Photovoltaic and Light-Emitting Devices. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015, 10, 391–402. 10.1038/nnano.2015.90. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhou Y.; Zhu K. Perovskite Solar Cells Shine in the “Valley of the Sun”. ACS Energy Lett. 2016, 1, 64–67. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00069. - DOI
    1. Yang M.; Zhou Y.; Zeng Y.; Jiang C.-S.; Padture N. P.; Zhu K. Square-Centimeter Solution-Processed Planar CH3NH3PbI3 Perovskite Solar Cells with Efficiency Exceeding 15%. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 6363–6370. 10.1002/adma.201502586. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhou Y.; Yang M.; Pang S.; Zhu K.; Padture N. P. Exceptional Morphology-Preserving Evolution of Formamidinium Lead Triiodide Perovskite Thin Films via Organic-Cation Displacement. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 5535–5538. 10.1021/jacs.6b02787. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources