Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 7;9(6):1241-1251.
doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.3c00288. eCollection 2023 Jun 28.

Covalent Proteins as Targeted Radionuclide Therapies Enhance Antitumor Effects

Affiliations

Covalent Proteins as Targeted Radionuclide Therapies Enhance Antitumor Effects

Paul C Klauser et al. ACS Cent Sci. .

Abstract

Molecularly targeted radionuclide therapies (TRTs) struggle with balancing efficacy and safety, as current strategies to increase tumor absorption often alter drug pharmacokinetics to prolong circulation and normal tissue irradiation. Here we report the first covalent protein TRT, which, through reacting with the target irreversibly, increases radioactive dose to the tumor without altering the drug's pharmacokinetic profile or normal tissue biodistribution. Through genetic code expansion, we engineered a latent bioreactive amino acid into a nanobody, which binds to its target protein and forms a covalent linkage via the proximity-enabled reactivity, cross-linking the target irreversibly in vitro, on cancer cells, and on tumors in vivo. The radiolabeled covalent nanobody markedly increases radioisotope levels in tumors and extends tumor residence time while maintaining rapid systemic clearance. Furthermore, the covalent nanobody conjugated to the α-emitter actinium-225 inhibits tumor growth more effectively than the noncovalent nanobody without causing tissue toxicity. Shifting the protein-based TRT from noncovalent to covalent mode, this chemical strategy improves tumor responses to TRTs and can be readily scaled to diverse protein radiopharmaceuticals engaging broad tumor targets.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare the following competing financial interest(s): P.C.K., L.C., B.Y., M.J.E., and L.W. are inventors on a patent application filed by The Regents of the University of California.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Covalent protein radiopharmaceuticals to enhance efficacy and safety for TRT. A schematic comparison of the noncovalent WT NbHER2 (A) and the covalent NbHER2 (B) in targeted delivery of radionuclide to HER2-expressing cancer cells. The noncovalent NbHER2 binds HER2 reversibly allowing dissociation. In contrast, when the covalent NbHER2 binds to HER2, the latent bioreactive Uaa FSY reacts with Lys through proximity-enabled SuFEx reaction, resulting in irreversible cross-linking of NbHER2 with HER2 and persistent tumoral retention of the attached radionuclide.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Genetically encoding FSY in NbHER2 to covalently cross-link HER2 irreversibly in vitro. (A) Crystal structure of NbHER2 bound to HER2 ECD (PDB: 5MY6), showing the FSY incorporation site (D54) and the proximal target residue (K150) in HER2. (B) Western blot analysis of NbHER2(FSY) production in E. coli with and without 1 mM FSY in growth media. A His6x tag was appended at the C-terminus of NbHER2 for detection. (C) Mass spectrum of the intact NbHER2(FSY) protein confirming FSY incorporation at position 54 in high fidelity. (D) NbHER2(FSY), but not NbHER2(WT), cross-linked with HER2 ECD in vitro. Indicated proteins were incubated at 37 °C for 4 h followed with Western blot analysis. (E) Tandem mass spectrum of NbHER2(FSY) incubation with HER2 ECD confirmed that FSY (represented by U) of NbHER2(FSY) cross-linked with Lys150 of HER2 as designed. (F) Cross-linking of NbHER2(FSY) to HER2 ECD occurred efficiently at 10 min and increased with time. (G) Kinetics of NbHER2(FSY) cross-linking with HER2 ECD. NbHER2(FSY) concentrations in (F) were measured with densitometry and 1/[NbHER2(FSY)] was plotted against time. Linear regression of the data yielded a second-order rate constant of 34154 ± 1921 M–1min–1 (mean ± s.d.). Error bars represent s.d., n = 3 independent experiments.
Figure 3
Figure 3
NbHER2(FSY) covalently cross-linked native HER2 on cancer cells and on tumor in vivo. (A) NbHER2(FSY) covalently cross-linked HER2 on NCI-N87 cell surface. NbHER2 proteins were incubated with NCI-N87 cells for 3 h followed with Western blot analysis. (B) Cross-linking of NbHER2(FSY) with cancer cells were HER2 specific. Cross-linking occurred only on NCI-N87 and SK-OV-3 cells, which have detectable HER2 expression. (C) NbHER2(FSY) covalently cross-linked HER2 on NCI-N87 tumor in vivo. NbHER2(FSY) or NbHER2(WT)was injected into mice xenografted with HER2-expressing NCI-N87 tumor. After 6 h postinjection, the tumor was excised and homogenized, followed with Western blot analysis.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Radiolabeled covalent nanobody 124I-NbHER2(FSY) prolonged tumor retention, increased tumor accumulation and exhibited low background in mice. (A) Schematic procedures to radiolabel WT and covalent NbHER2 with 124I by IODO-GEN. Tyrosine is usually labeled at the ortho position with mono- or di-iodination. (B) Iodine labeling did not impair NbHER2(FSY) cross-linking with HER2. The cold NaI labeled product I-NbHER2(FSY) or the unlabeled NbHER2(FSY) was incubated with HER2 ECD for cross-linking, followed with Western blot analysis. (C) The covalent 124I-NbHER2(FSY) enabled specific and sustained tumor accumulation of 124I. Tumors were clearly detectable 24–72 h postinjection for 124I-NbHER2(FSY) but not 124I-NbHER2(WT). Representative decay-corrected PET images of mice xenografted with HER2-expressing NCI-N87 tumor and injected with either 124I-NbHER2(WT) or 124I-NbHER2(FSY) are shown. The transverse images of mice were taken at 3–72 h postinjection. Color bars indicate percent injected dose per gram (%ID/g). (D) The covalent 124I-NbHER2(FSY) significantly enhanced tumor accumulation of 124I than 124I-NbHER2(WT). The standardized uptake value (SUV) of 124I in tumor was quantified in percent injected dose per cm3 (%ID/cc) and plotted with postinjection time. The increase in tumor uptake by 124I-NbHER2(FSY) over 124I-NbHER2(WT) is highlighted in cyan. Error bars represent s.d.; n = 3 mice for 124I-NbHER2(WT) injection; n = 4 mice for 124I-NbHER2(FSY) injection; ns, not significant; ** p < 0.01; Student’s t test for statistical analysis. (E) The covalent 124I-NbHER2(FSY) enabled clear imaging of tumor distinct from the background. 3D PET image reconstruction of mice 24–72 h postinjection of 124I-NbHER2(WT) or 124I-NbHER2(FSY) are shown. Color bars indicate %ID/g. n = 3 mice for 124I-NbHER2(WT) injection; n = 4 mice for 124I-NbHER2(FSY) injection.
Figure 5
Figure 5
α-Emitter labeled covalent 225Ac-NbHER2(FSY) inhibited tumor growth in mice without tissue toxicity. (A) Schematic procedures to radiolabel WT and covalent NbHER2 with 225Ac. (B) Mass spectrometric analyses confirming successful conjugation of Macropa-PEG4 on NbHER2(WT) (top panel) and NbHER2(FSY) (bottom panel). (C) Western blot analysis confirming that Macropa-PEG4 labeling did not impair NbHER2(FSY) cross-linking with HER2. Cross-linking of Macropa-PEG4-NbHER2(FSY) to HER2 ECD occurred efficiently after 10 min incubation and increased with time, while no cross-linking was detected with Macropa-PEG4-NbHER2(WT). (D) Experiment scheme for TRT of NCI-N87 tumor in mice. (E) Growth curves of engrafted NCI-N87 tumors indicate that 225Ac-NbHER2(FSY) inhibited tumor growth, while 225Ac-NbHER2(WT) did not. (F) Weight comparison of dissected tumors showing tumor weight reduction by 225Ac-NbHER2(FSY) treatment. (G) Mice body weight remained stable over the course of the therapy study. For panels E–G, error bars represent SEM; n = 8 mice for 225Ac-NbHER2(FSY) treatment group; n = 7 mice for 225Ac-NbHER2(WT) treatment group; n = 5 mice for vehicle saline control. ns, not significant; *p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001; Student’s t test for statistical analysis. (H) Representative microscopic images of hematoxylin and eosin stained liver, kidneys, heart, and bone marrow for both 225Ac-NbHER2(WT) and 225Ac-NbHER2(FSY) treatment groups. No abnormalities were detected in the tissues. Scale bar, 50 μm.

References

    1. Bodei L.; Herrmann K.; Schöder H.; Scott A. M.; Lewis J. S. Radiotheranostics in Oncology: Current Challenges and Emerging Opportunities. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2022, 19 (8), 534–550. 10.1038/s41571-022-00652-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sgouros G.; Bodei L.; McDevitt M. R.; Nedrow J. R. Radiopharmaceutical Therapy in Cancer: Clinical Advances and Challenges. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2020, 19 (9), 589–608. 10.1038/s41573-020-0073-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hofman M. S.; Emmett L.; Sandhu S.; Iravani A.; Joshua A. M.; Goh J. C.; Pattison D. A.; Tan T. H.; Kirkwood I. D.; Ng S.; et al. 177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus Cabazitaxel in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (TheraP): A Randomised, Open-Label, Phase 2 Trial. Lancet 2021, 397 (10276), 797–804. 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00237-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tagawa S. T.; Milowsky M. I.; Morris M.; Vallabhajosula S.; Christos P.; Akhtar N. H.; Osborne J.; Goldsmith S. J.; Larson S.; Taskar N. P.; et al. Phase II Study of Lutetium-177–Labeled Anti-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Monoclonal Antibody J591 for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013, 19 (18), 5182–5191. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0231. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sartor O.; de Bono J.; Chi K. N.; Fizazi K.; Herrmann K.; Rahbar K.; Tagawa S. T.; Nordquist L. T.; Vaishampayan N.; El-Haddad G.; et al. Lutetium-177–PSMA-617 for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 385 (12), 1091–1103. 10.1056/NEJMoa2107322. - DOI - PMC - PubMed