Creating a model of cross-task motivation - A meta-narrative review of the literature on dynamic motivation
- PMID: 37397295
- PMCID: PMC10313063
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1193186
Creating a model of cross-task motivation - A meta-narrative review of the literature on dynamic motivation
Abstract
Introduction: Substantial research on job motivation over the years has identified motivation to be essential to work outcomes such as wellbeing, attitudes, and performance. Yet, research on job motivation addressing temporal influences has been sparse. Existing research has addressed job motivation as an aggregation of the motivation for tasks, ignoring the possibility of temporal effects where the motivation for one task affects motivation in a subsequent task. The current meta-narrative review analyzes existing research on task motivation and synthesizes findings into a model of cross-task motivation.
Methods: Using a predetermined search strategy, a systematic search yielded 1,635 documents of which 17 were selected. Papers were analyzed using a meta-narrative approach according to RAMSES publication standards.
Results: Four key meta-narratives were identified, contributing information from different research traditions; (1) restoration effects after need frustration, (2) intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, (3) cognitive carryover effects, and (4) meaning of work. Synthesizing findings from these meta-narratives, a meta-theoretical model for understanding cross-task motivation was proposed.
Discussion: This model provides an extension of existing motivational theories elucidating temporal motivational processes. Implications for practitioners include the possibility of arranging jobs to maximize positive motivational outcomes.
Keywords: cross-task; dynamic motivation; intrinsic motivation; meaningfulness; self-determination theory; situational motivation.
Copyright © 2023 Feyer.
Conflict of interest statement
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Chadi A., Jeworrek S., Mertins V. (2017). When the meaning of work has disappeared: experimental evidence on employees' performance and emotions. Manage. Sci. 63, 1696–1707. 10.1287/mnsc.2016.2426 - DOI
-
- Deci E. L., Olafsen A. H., Ryan R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: the state of a science. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 4, 19–43. 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108 - DOI
-
- Deci E. L., Ryan R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-determination in Human Behavior. New York, NY: Plenum. 10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7 - DOI
-
- Deci E. L., Ryan R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol. Inq. 11, 227–268. 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01 - DOI
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
