Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 15:11:1179261.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1179261. eCollection 2023.

There is a need for more precise models to assess the determinants of health crises like COVID-19

Affiliations

There is a need for more precise models to assess the determinants of health crises like COVID-19

Alessandro Rovetta. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on global mortality. While the causal relationship between SARS-CoV-2 and the anomalous increase in deaths is established, more precise and complex models are needed to determine the exact weight of epidemiological factors involved. Indeed, COVID-19 behavior is influenced by a wide range of variables, including demographic characteristics, population habits and behavior, healthcare performance, and environmental and seasonal risk factors. The bidirectional causality between impacted and impacting aspects, as well as confounding variables, complicates efforts to draw clear, generalizable conclusions regarding the effectiveness and cost-benefit ratio of non-pharmaceutical health countermeasures. Thus, it is imperative that the scientific community and health authorities worldwide develop comprehensive models not only for the current pandemic but also for future health crises. These models should be implemented locally to account for micro-differences in epidemiological characteristics that may have relevant effects. It is important to note that the lack of a universal model does not imply that local decisions have been unjustified, and the request to decrease scientific uncertainty does not mean denying the evidence of the effectiveness of the countermeasures adopted. Therefore, this paper must not be exploited to denigrate either the scientific community or the health authorities.

Keywords: COVID-19; confounding (epidemiology); epidemic determinants; epidemiology - analytic (risk factors); public health; public health policies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Rovetta A, Bhagavathula AS. The impact of COVID-19 on mortality in Italy: retrospective analysis of epidemiological trends. JMIR Public Health Surv. (2022) 8:e36022. 10.2196/36022 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rovetta A. Annual excess crude mortality in Europe during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal joinpoint regression analysis of historical trends from 2000 to 2021. COVID. (2022) 2:1778–86. 10.3390/covid2120128 - DOI
    1. COVID-19 Excess Mortality Collaborators (2022). Estimating excess mortality due to the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic analysis of COVID-19-related mortality, 2020–21. Lancet. 399:1513–36. 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02796-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lash TL, Fox MP, MacLehose RF, Maldonado G, McCandless LC, Greenland S. Good practices for quantitative bias analysis. Int J Epidemiol. (2014) 43:1969–85. 10.1093/ije/dyu149 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Greenland S. Transparency and disclosure, neutrality and balance: shared values or just shared words? J Epidemiol Commun Health. (2012) 66:967–70. 10.1136/jech-2011-200459 - DOI - PubMed