This is a preprint.
Differences in Cardiac Mechanics among Genetically At-Risk First-Degree Relatives: The DCM Precision Medicine Study
- PMID: 37398079
- PMCID: PMC10312893
- DOI: 10.1101/2023.05.30.23290123
Differences in Cardiac Mechanics among Genetically At-Risk First-Degree Relatives: The DCM Precision Medicine Study
Abstract
Aims: Among genetically at-risk first-degree relatives (FDRs) of probands with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), the ability to detect changes in left ventricular (LV) mechanics with normal LV size and ejection fraction (LVEF) remains incompletely explored. We sought to define a pre-DCM phenotype among at-risk FDRs, including those with variants of uncertain significance (VUSs), using echocardiographic measures of cardiac mechanics.
Methods and results: LV structure and function, including speckle-tracking analysis for LV global longitudinal strain (GLS), were evaluated in 124 FDRs (65% female; median age 44.9 [IQR: 30.6-60.3] years) of 66 DCM probands of European ancestry sequenced for rare variants in 35 DCM genes. FDRs had normal LV size and LVEF. Negative FDRs of probands with pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants (n=28) were a reference group to which negative FDRs of probands without P/LP variants (n=30), FDRs with only VUSs (n=27), and FDRs with P/LP variants (n=39) were compared. In an analysis accounting for age-dependent penetrance, FDRs below the median age showed minimal differences in LV GLS across groups while those above it with P/LP variants or VUSs had lower absolute values than the reference group (-3.9 [95% CI: -5.7, -2.1] or -3.1 [-4.8, -1.4] %-units) and negative FDRs of probands without P/LP variants (-2.6 [-4.0, -1.2] or -1.8 [-3.1, -0.6]).
Conclusions: Older FDRs with normal LV size and LVEF who harbored P/LP variants or VUSs had lower absolute LV GLS values, indicating that some DCM-related VUSs are clinically relevant. LV GLS may have utility for defining a pre-DCM phenotype.
Clinical trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03037632.
Keywords: cardiomyopathy; echocardiography; family-based study; genetics.
Conflict of interest statement
CONFLICT OF INTEREST Dr. Shah reports receiving consulting fees from Abbott, Actelion, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Aria CV, Axon Therapies, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Coridea, CVRx, Cyclerion, Cytokinetics, Edwards Lifesciences, Eidos, Eisai, Imara, Impulse Dynamics, GSK, Intellia, Ionis, Ironwood, Lilly, Merck, Metabolic Flux, MyoKardia, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Prothena, Regeneron, Rivus, Sanofi, Sardocor, Shifamed, Tenax, Tenaya, and United Therapeutics. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med 2015;17:405–424. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous