In reply
- PMID: 37399046
- DOI: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000981
In reply
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose.
Comment on
-
A novel method for quantitative evaluation of motor evoked potential monitoring during cerebrovascular surgeries.J Clin Neurosci. 2022 Apr;98:29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2022.01.026. Epub 2022 Feb 4. J Clin Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 35131722
References
-
- Wilkinson MF, Chowdhury T, Kaufmann AM. A novel method for quantitative evaluation of motor evoked potential monitoring during cerebrovascular surgeries. J Clin Neurosci 2022;98:29–36.
-
- Gonzalez AA, Akopian V, Lagoa I, Shilian P, Parikh P. Crossover phenomena in motor evoked potentials during intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of cranial surgeries. J Clin Neurophysiol 2019;36:236–241.
-
- Chen JH, Gonzalez AA, Shilian P, Cheongsiatmoy J. An alternative transcranial motor evoked potential montage to minimize ipsilateral “crossover” motor responses. Neurodiagnostic J 2018;58:218–225.
-
- Gonzalez AA, Mahani T, Parikh P. Anodal Stimulation latency response differences between ipsilateral and contralateral motor evoked potentials in hand muscles. J Clin Neurophysiol 2022. Publish Ahead of Print. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000925. - DOI
-
- Parikh P, Kim E, Shilian P, Gonzalez AA. What could wide latency differences between ipsilateral and contralateral MEP responses suggest? American Clinical Neurophysiology Society (ACNS) Annual Meeting Poster Abstract; February 2020; New Orleans, LA.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources