Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 3;16(1):82.
doi: 10.1186/s40545-023-00587-4.

The role of on-site pharmacist in residential aged care facilities: findings from the PiRACF study

Ibrahim Haider  1   2 , Sam Kosari  3 , Mark Naunton  3 , Jane Koerner  4 , Michael Dale  4 , Sundus Nizamani  4 , Rachel Davey  4
Affiliations

The role of on-site pharmacist in residential aged care facilities: findings from the PiRACF study

Ibrahim Haider et al. J Pharm Policy Pract. .

Abstract

Background: Residents in residential aged care facilities (RACFs) have a high number of medication-related problems. Integrating on-site pharmacists (OSPs) into this setting is a possible solution and is currently gaining traction in Australia and internationally. The Pharmacists in Residential Aged Care Facilities (PiRACF) cluster-randomised controlled trial integrated pharmacists into the RACF care team to improve medication management. The aim of this descriptive observational study is to explore the activities of OSPs when they are integrated into multidisciplinary care team in RACFs.

Method: An online survey tool was developed to record the activities of OSPs in RACFs using the Qualtrics© software. OSPs were asked questions about their activities in RACFs under categories that included description, time spent, outcomes where applicable and who the pharmacists communicated with to undertake the activity.

Results: Six pharmacists were integrated into 7 RACFs. Overall, they recorded 4252 activities over 12 months. OSPs conducted 1022 (24.0%) clinical medication reviews; 48.8% of medication reviews identified and discussed potentially inappropriate medications with prescribers and 1025 other recommendations were made to prescribers. Overall, the prescriber accepted 51.5% of all recommendations made by OSPs. The most frequently accepted outcome was deprescribing of medications (47.5% for potentially inappropriate medications and 55.5% for other recommendations). OSPs performed facility-level activities including staff education (13.4%), clinical audits (5.8%), and quality improvement activities (9.4%). OSPs spent a large proportion of their time communicating (23.4%) extensively with prescribers, RACF's healthcare team, and residents.

Conclusion: OSPs successfully performed a wide range of clinical activities aimed both at improving residents' medication regimens, and organisational-level quality improvement. The OSP model presents an opportunity for pharmacists to enhance medication management in the residential aged care setting. Trial registration The trial was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) (ACTRN: ACTRN12620000430932) on April 1, 2020.

Keywords: Care home; Medication-related problems; Nursing home; On-site pharmacists; Pharmacist activities; Residential aged care facilities; Role of pharmacist in aged care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The on-site pharmacist in residential aged care facility model
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sluggett JK, Ilomäki J, Seaman KL, Corlis M, Bell JS. Medication management policy, practice and research in Australian residential aged care: current and future directions. Pharmacol Res. 2017;116:20–28. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2016.12.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen EYH, Wang KN, Sluggett JK, Ilomäki J, Hilmer SN, Corlis M, et al. Process, impact and outcomes of medication review in Australian residential aged care facilities: a systematic review. Australas J Ageing. 2019;38:9–25. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12676. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shah BM, Hajjar ER. Polypharmacy, adverse drug reactions, and geriatric syndromes. Clin Geriatr Med. 2012;28:173–186. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2012.01.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hajjar ER, Cafiero AC, Hanlon JT. Polypharmacy in elderly patients [Internet] Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2007;5:345–351. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2007.12.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nishtala PS, McLachlan AJ, Bell JS, Chen TF. A retrospective study of drug-related problems in Australian aged care homes: medication reviews involving pharmacists and general practitioners. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010;17:97–103. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01374.x. - DOI - PubMed