Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug;12(15):16142-16162.
doi: 10.1002/cam4.6272. Epub 2023 Jul 3.

Association of the CHEK2 c.1100delC variant, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment with contralateral breast cancer risk and breast cancer-specific survival

Anna Morra  1 Maartje A C Schreurs  2 Irene L Andrulis  3   4 Hoda Anton-Culver  5 Annelie Augustinsson  6 Matthias W Beckmann  7 Sabine Behrens  8 Stig E Bojesen  9   10   11 Manjeet K Bolla  12 Hiltrud Brauch  13   14   15 Annegien Broeks  1 Saundra S Buys  16 Nicola J Camp  16 Jose E Castelao  17 Melissa H Cessna  18 Jenny Chang-Claude  8   19 Wendy K Chung  20 NBCS Collaborators  21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30 Sarah V Colonna  16 Fergus J Couch  31 Angela Cox  32 Simon S Cross  33 Kamila Czene  34 Mary B Daly  35 Joe Dennis  12 Peter Devilee  36   37 Thilo Dörk  38 Alison M Dunning  39 Miriam Dwek  40 Douglas F Easton  12   39 Diana M Eccles  41 Mikael Eriksson  34 D Gareth Evans  42   43 Peter A Fasching  7 Tanja N Fehm  44 Jonine D Figueroa  45   46   47 Henrik Flyger  48 Marike Gabrielson  34 Manuela Gago-Dominguez  49 Montserrat García-Closas  47 José A García-Sáenz  50 Jeanine Genkinger  51   52 Felix Grassmann  34   53 Melanie Gündert  54   55   56 Eric Hahnen  57   58 Christopher A Haiman  59 Ute Hamann  60 Patricia A Harrington  39 Jaana M Hartikainen  61   62 Reiner Hoppe  13   63 John L Hopper  64 Richard S Houlston  65 Anthony Howell  66 ABCTB Investigators  67 kConFab Investigators  68   69 Anna Jakubowska  70   71 Wolfgang Janni  72 Helena Jernström  6 Esther M John  73   74 Nichola Johnson  75 Michael E Jones  65 Vessela N Kristensen  22   28 Allison W Kurian  73   74 Diether Lambrechts  76   77 Loic Le Marchand  78 Annika Lindblom  79   80 Jan Lubiński  70 Michael P Lux  7 Arto Mannermaa  61   62   81 Dimitrios Mavroudis  82 Anna Marie Mulligan  83   84 Taru A Muranen  85 Heli Nevanlinna  85 Ines Nevelsteen  86 Patrick Neven  86 William G Newman  42   43 Nadia Obi  87 Kenneth Offit  88   89 Andrew F Olshan  90 Tjoung-Won Park-Simon  38 Alpa V Patel  91 Paolo Peterlongo  92 Kelly-Anne Phillips  64   93   94 Dijana Plaseska-Karanfilska  95 Eric C Polley  96 Nadege Presneau  40 Katri Pylkäs  97   98 Brigitte Rack  72 Paolo Radice  99 Muhammad U Rashid  60   100 Valerie Rhenius  39 Mark Robson  89 Atocha Romero  101 Emmanouil Saloustros  102 Elinor J Sawyer  103 Rita K Schmutzler  57   58   104 Sabine Schuetze  72 Christopher Scott  96 Mitul Shah  39 Snezhana Smichkoska  105 Melissa C Southey  106   107   108 William J Tapper  41 Lauren R Teras  91 Rob A E M Tollenaar  109 Katarzyna Tomczyk  75 Ian Tomlinson  110 Melissa A Troester  90 Celine M Vachon  111 Elke M van Veen  42   43 Qin Wang  12 Camilla Wendt  112   113 Hans Wildiers  86 Robert Winqvist  97   98 Argyrios Ziogas  5 Per Hall  34   113 Paul D P Pharoah  12   39 Muriel A Adank  114 Antoinette Hollestelle  2 Marjanka K Schmidt  1   115 Maartje J Hooning  2
Collaborators, Affiliations

Association of the CHEK2 c.1100delC variant, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment with contralateral breast cancer risk and breast cancer-specific survival

Anna Morra et al. Cancer Med. 2023 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer (BC) patients with a germline CHEK2 c.1100delC variant have an increased risk of contralateral BC (CBC) and worse BC-specific survival (BCSS) compared to non-carriers.

Aim: To assessed the associations of CHEK2 c.1100delC, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment with CBC risk and BCSS.

Methods: Analyses were based on 82,701 women diagnosed with a first primary invasive BC including 963 CHEK2 c.1100delC carriers; median follow-up was 9.1 years. Differential associations with treatment by CHEK2 c.1100delC status were tested by including interaction terms in a multivariable Cox regression model. A multi-state model was used for further insight into the relation between CHEK2 c.1100delC status, treatment, CBC risk and death.

Results: There was no evidence for differential associations of therapy with CBC risk by CHEK2 c.1100delC status. The strongest association with reduced CBC risk was observed for the combination of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy [HR (95% CI): 0.66 (0.55-0.78)]. No association was observed with radiotherapy. Results from the multi-state model showed shorter BCSS for CHEK2 c.1100delC carriers versus non-carriers also after accounting for CBC occurrence [HR (95% CI): 1.30 (1.09-1.56)].

Conclusion: Systemic therapy was associated with reduced CBC risk irrespective of CHEK2 c.1100delC status. Moreover, CHEK2 c.1100delC carriers had shorter BCSS, which appears not to be fully explained by their CBC risk.

Keywords: CHEK2 c.1100delC germline genetic variant; contralateral breast cancer risk; radiotherapy; survival; systemic treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Matthias W. Beckmann and Peter A. Fasching conduct research funded by Amgen, Novartis and Pfizer (not related to this study). Peter A. Fasching received Honoraria from Roche, Novartis and Pfizer (not related to this study). Allison W. Kurian's institution received a research funding from Myriad genetics for an unrelated project (not related to this study). Emmanouil Saloustros reported the following: honoraria from Amgen Hellas, Pfizer Hellas, and IPSEN (not related to this study) and support from Merck Greece and Pfizer Hellas for attending meetings (not related to this study); he participated in advisory boards in Greece (MSD Greece, AstraZeneca Greece, Gilead Sciences Hellas, Pfizer Hellas, Genesis Pharma), not related to this study; he is a PI in sponsored clinical trials: MSD Greece (not related to this study). The other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Data flowchart of inclusion and exclusion of patients with breast cancer from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) database.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Graphical representation of the multi‐state model. BC, breast cancer; CBC, contralateral breast cancer.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209‐249. - PubMed
    1. CHEK2 Breast Cancer Case‐Control Consortium . CHEK2*1100delC and susceptibility to breast cancer: a collaborative analysis involving 10,860 breast cancer cases and 9,065 controls from 10 studies. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;74:1175‐1182. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schmidt MK, Hogervorst F, van Hien R, et al. Age‐ and tumor subtype‐specific breast cancer risk estimates for CHEK2*1100delC carriers. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:2750‐2760. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weischer M, Nordestgaard BG, Pharoah P, et al. CHEK2*1100delC heterozygosity in women with breast cancer associated with early death, breast cancer‐specific death, and increased risk of a second breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:4308‐4316. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thompson D, Seal S, Schutte M, et al. A multicenter study of cancer incidence in CHEK2 1100delC mutation carriers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:2542‐2545. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding