Biomechanical Comparison of Multilevel Stand-Alone Lumbar Lateral Interbody Fusion With Posterior Pedicle Screws: An In Vitro Study
- PMID: 37401066
- PMCID: PMC10323329
- DOI: 10.14245/ns.2244734.367
Biomechanical Comparison of Multilevel Stand-Alone Lumbar Lateral Interbody Fusion With Posterior Pedicle Screws: An In Vitro Study
Abstract
Objective: Lumbar lateral interbody fusion (LLIF) allows placement of large interbody cages while preserving ligamentous structures important for stability. Multiple clinical and biomechanical studies have demonstrated the feasibility of stand-alone LLIF in single-level fusion. We sought to compare the stability of 4-level stand-alone LLIF utilizing wide (26 mm) cages with bilateral pedicle screw and rod fixation.
Methods: Eight human cadaveric specimens of L1-5 were included. Specimens were attached to a universal testing machine (MTS 30/G). Flexion, extension, and lateral bending were attained by applying a 200 N load at a rate of 2 mm/sec. Axial rotation of ± 8° of the specimen was performed at 2°/sec. Three-dimensional specimen motion was recorded using an optical motion-tracking device. Specimens were tested in 4 conditions: (1) intact, (2) bilateral pedicle screws and rods, (3) 26-mm stand-alone LLIF, (4) 26-mm LLIF with bilateral pedicle screws and rods.
Results: Compared to the stand-alone LLIF, bilateral pedicle screws and rods had 47% less range of motion in flexion-extension (p < 0.001), 21% less in lateral bending (p < 0.05), and 20% less in axial rotation (p = 0.1). The addition of bilateral posterior instrumentation to the stand-alone LLIF resulted in decreases of all 3 planes of motion: 61% in flexion-extension ( p < 0.001), 57% in lateral bending (p < 0.001), 22% in axial rotation (p = 0.002).
Conclusion: Despite the biomechanical advantages associated with the lateral approach and 26 mm wide cages, stand-alone LLIF for 4-level fusion is not equivalent to pedicle screws and rods.
Keywords: Biomechanics; Extreme lateral interbody fusion; Lateral interbody fusion; Lumbar lateral interbody fusion; Multilevel; Stand-alone.
Conflict of interest statement
Drs. James Mok and Farid Amirouche disclose in-kind product donation by Nuvasive. Dr. James Mok discloses that he receives consulting fees and royalties from MiRus. The other authors have nothing to disclose.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Biomechanical Comparison of Unilateral and Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation after Multilevel Lumbar Lateral Interbody Fusion.Global Spine J. 2024 Jun;14(5):1524-1531. doi: 10.1177/21925682221149392. Epub 2022 Dec 29. Global Spine J. 2024. PMID: 36583232 Free PMC article.
-
Biomechanical evaluation of lateral lumbar interbody fusion with secondary augmentation.J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Dec;25(6):720-726. doi: 10.3171/2016.4.SPINE151386. Epub 2016 Jul 8. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016. PMID: 27391398
-
Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Apr 1;31(7):762-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000206360.83728.d2. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006. PMID: 16582849
-
Interspinous Process (ISP) Devices in Comparison to the Use of Traditional Posterior Spinal Instrumentation.Cureus. 2021 Mar 14;13(3):e13886. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13886. Cureus. 2021. PMID: 33868850 Free PMC article. Review.
-
MIS Expandable Interbody Spacers: A Literature Review and Biomechanical Comparison of an Expandable MIS TLIF With Conventional TLIF and ALIF.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Apr;41 Suppl 8:S44-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001465. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016. PMID: 26825792 Review.
Cited by
-
Lateral Fusion is a Unique Feature in Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Global Spine J. 2025 Jun;15(5):2714-2725. doi: 10.1177/21925682241310151. Epub 2024 Dec 17. Global Spine J. 2025. PMID: 39690925 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Shah M, Kolb B, Yilmaz E, et al. Comparison of lumbar laminectomy alone, lumbar laminectomy and fusion, stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion, and stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a review of the literature. Cureus. 2019;11:e5691. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, et al. Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J. 2006;6:435–43. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources