Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun;20(2):478-486.
doi: 10.14245/ns.2244734.367. Epub 2023 Jun 30.

Biomechanical Comparison of Multilevel Stand-Alone Lumbar Lateral Interbody Fusion With Posterior Pedicle Screws: An In Vitro Study

Affiliations

Biomechanical Comparison of Multilevel Stand-Alone Lumbar Lateral Interbody Fusion With Posterior Pedicle Screws: An In Vitro Study

James M Mok et al. Neurospine. 2023 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: Lumbar lateral interbody fusion (LLIF) allows placement of large interbody cages while preserving ligamentous structures important for stability. Multiple clinical and biomechanical studies have demonstrated the feasibility of stand-alone LLIF in single-level fusion. We sought to compare the stability of 4-level stand-alone LLIF utilizing wide (26 mm) cages with bilateral pedicle screw and rod fixation.

Methods: Eight human cadaveric specimens of L1-5 were included. Specimens were attached to a universal testing machine (MTS 30/G). Flexion, extension, and lateral bending were attained by applying a 200 N load at a rate of 2 mm/sec. Axial rotation of ± 8° of the specimen was performed at 2°/sec. Three-dimensional specimen motion was recorded using an optical motion-tracking device. Specimens were tested in 4 conditions: (1) intact, (2) bilateral pedicle screws and rods, (3) 26-mm stand-alone LLIF, (4) 26-mm LLIF with bilateral pedicle screws and rods.

Results: Compared to the stand-alone LLIF, bilateral pedicle screws and rods had 47% less range of motion in flexion-extension (p < 0.001), 21% less in lateral bending (p < 0.05), and 20% less in axial rotation (p = 0.1). The addition of bilateral posterior instrumentation to the stand-alone LLIF resulted in decreases of all 3 planes of motion: 61% in flexion-extension ( p < 0.001), 57% in lateral bending (p < 0.001), 22% in axial rotation (p = 0.002).

Conclusion: Despite the biomechanical advantages associated with the lateral approach and 26 mm wide cages, stand-alone LLIF for 4-level fusion is not equivalent to pedicle screws and rods.

Keywords: Biomechanics; Extreme lateral interbody fusion; Lateral interbody fusion; Lumbar lateral interbody fusion; Multilevel; Stand-alone.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

Drs. James Mok and Farid Amirouche disclose in-kind product donation by Nuvasive. Dr. James Mok discloses that he receives consulting fees and royalties from MiRus. The other authors have nothing to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Experimental setup demonstrating the load cell applied to the cadaveric spine specimen in flexion/extension (A) and axial rotation (B). Optical motion sensors were placed from L1 to L5 to track segmental motion.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Shah M, Kolb B, Yilmaz E, et al. Comparison of lumbar laminectomy alone, lumbar laminectomy and fusion, stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion, and stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a review of the literature. Cureus. 2019;11:e5691. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Watkins R, 4th, Watkins R, 3rd, Hanna R. Non-union rate with stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Medicine (Baltimore) 2014;93:e275. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Winder MJ, Gambhir S. Comparison of ALIF vs. XLIF for L4/5 interbody fusion: pros, cons, and literature review. J Spine Surg. 2016;2:2–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, et al. Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J. 2006;6:435–43. - PubMed
    1. Agarwal N, White MD, Zhang X, et al. Impact of endplateimplant area mismatch on rates and grades of subsidence following stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: an analysis of 623 levels. J Neurosurg Spine. 2020 Mar 6;:1–5. doi: 10.3171/2020.1.SPINE19776. doi: . [Epub] - DOI - PubMed