Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec;82(1):2231618.
doi: 10.1080/22423982.2023.2231618.

Occupational multimorbidity in the nickel industry workers

Affiliations

Occupational multimorbidity in the nickel industry workers

Sergei Syurin et al. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2023 Dec.

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to obtain new data on the causes, development, prevalence and nature of occupational multimorbidity in the nickel industry workers. We extracted data from the register of occupational disease and intoxication cases in the population of the Murmansk region and the Krasnoyarsk Territory in 2007-2021. In 2007-2021, 24.6% of nickel industry workers with newly diagnosed occupational diseases developed a multimorbid pathology. Its prevalence rose from 0% in 2007 to 83.3% in 2021, and the number of occupational diseases increased by 3.17 times. Two diagnoses were found in 66 (14.9%), three in 22 (5.0%), four in fifteen (3.4%), five in eleven (2.5%), and six in three (0.7%) employees. Respiratory and musculoskeletal diseases were the most prevalent disorders, accounting for 31.5% and 23.0% of cases, respectively. Occupational multimorbidity resulted from the increased combined exposure to occupational hazards, outdated technological processes, and the working conditions in the finished product cleaners and crane operators. Multimorbid diseases can be better prevented with improvement in working conditions and better quality of periodic medical examinations.

Keywords: Nickel industry; health risks; multimorbidity; occupational diseases; working conditions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Annual number of newly diagnosed occupational diseases and workers with occupational pathology in 2007–2021.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Growing number of occupational disease diagnoses per employee from 2007 till 2021.

Similar articles

References

    1. Loomis D. Estimating the global burden of disease from occupational exposures. Occup Environ Med. 2020;77:151–8. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2019-106349 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Migunova Yu V. The dynamics of occupational morbidity in Russia: the essence, signs, features of manifestation at the regional level. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya. Теория и практика общественного развития. 2021;6(6):37–40. doi: 10.24158/tipor.2021.6.5 In Russ. - DOI
    1. Rushton L. The global burden of occupational disease. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2017;4(3):340–348. doi: 10.31089/1026-9428-2019-59-9-527-532 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nicholson K, Makovski TT, Grith LE, et al. Multimorbidity and comorbidity revisited: refining the concepts for international health research. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;105:142–146. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.09.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tarlovskaya EI. Comorbidity and polymorbidity - modern interpretation and urgent tasks facing the therapeutic community. Cardiol. 2018;58(S9):29–38. doi: 10.18087/cardio.2562 In Russ.). - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms