Towards an Implementation-STakeholder Engagement Model (I-STEM) for improving health and social care services
- PMID: 37403248
- PMCID: PMC10485327
- DOI: 10.1111/hex.13808
Towards an Implementation-STakeholder Engagement Model (I-STEM) for improving health and social care services
Abstract
Background: The implementation science literature acknowledges a need for engagement of key stakeholders when designing, delivering and evaluating implementation work. To date, the literature reports minimal or focused stakeholder engagement, where stakeholders are engaged in either barrier identification and/or barrier prioritisation. This paper begins to answer calls from the literature for the development of tools and guidance to support comprehensive stakeholder engagement in implementation research and practice. The paper describes the systematic development of the Implementation-STakeholder Engagement Model (I-STEM) in the context of an international, large-scale empirical implementation study (ImpleMentAll) aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of a tailored implementation toolkit. The I-STEM is a sensitising tool that defines key considerations and activities for undertaking stakeholder engagement activities across an implementation process.
Methods: In-depth, semistructured interviews and observations were conducted with implementers who were tailoring implementation strategies to integrate and embed internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) services in 12 routine mental health care organisations in nine countries in Europe and Australia. The analytical process was informed by principles of first- and third-generation Grounded Theory, including constant comparative method.
Results: We conducted 55 interviews and observed 19 implementation-related activities (e.g., team meetings and technical support calls). The final outcome of our analysis is expressed in an initial version of the I-STEM, consisting of five interrelated concepts: engagement objectives, stakeholder mapping, engagement approaches, engagement qualities and engagement outcomes. Engagement objectives are goals that implementers plan to achieve by working with stakeholders in the implementation process. Stakeholder mapping involves identifying a range of organisations, groups or people who may be instrumental in achieving the engagement objectives. Engagement approaches define the type of work that is undertaken with stakeholders to achieve the engagement objectives. Engagement qualities define the logistics of the engagement approach. Lastly, every engagement activity may result in a range of engagement outcomes.
Conclusion: The I-STEM represents potential avenues for substantial stakeholder engagement activity across key phases of an implementation process. It provides a conceptual model for the planning, delivery, evaluation and reporting of stakeholder engagement activities. The I-STEM is nonprescriptive and highlights the importance of a flexible, iterative approach to stakeholder engagement. It is developmental and will require application and validation across a range of implementation activities.
Patient or public contribution: Patient contribution to ImpleMentAll trial was facilitated by GAMIAN-Europe at all stages-from grant development to dissemination. GAMIAN-Europe brings together a wide variety of patient representation organisations (local, regional and national) from almost all European countries. GAMIAN-Europe was involved in pilot testing the ItFits-toolkit and provided their views on the various aspects, including stakeholder engagement. Patients were also represented in the external advisory board providing support and advice on the design, conduct and interpretation of the wider project, including the development of the ItFits-toolkit.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03652883. Retrospectively registered on 29 August 2018.
Keywords: co-design; co-production; implementation strategies; normalisation; stakeholder engagement; tailored implementation.
© 2023 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
How is tailored implementation undertaken using a self-guided toolkit? Qualitative study of the ItFits-toolkit in the ImpleMentAll project.Implement Sci. 2024 Jul 11;19(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01380-w. Implement Sci. 2024. PMID: 38992702 Free PMC article.
-
Tailored implementation of internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy in the multinational context of the ImpleMentAll project: a study protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial.Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):893. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04686-4. Trials. 2020. PMID: 33115545 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of Self-guided Tailored Implementation Strategies in Integrating and Embedding Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Routine Mental Health Care: Results of a Multicenter Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial.J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 3;25:e41532. doi: 10.2196/41532. J Med Internet Res. 2023. PMID: 36735287 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Creating a Survey of Community Engagement in Research [Internet].Washington (DC): Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2021 Oct. Washington (DC): Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2021 Oct. PMID: 39312613 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Comparing Methods to Make Research More Patient Centered [Internet].Washington (DC): Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2019 Dec. Washington (DC): Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2019 Dec. PMID: 39312606 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Stakeholder engagement in healthcare research in India - A systematic review.Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 May 15;23(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01341-9. Health Res Policy Syst. 2025. PMID: 40375276 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Leveraging research steering committees for stakeholder engagement: a multifaceted strategy in Brazilian implementation projects.Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025 Jul;68(7):747-757. doi: 10.1007/s00103-025-04081-x. Epub 2025 May 31. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025. PMID: 40448850 English.
-
Acceptability, feasibility, and factors affecting implementation of a gender-sensitivity training for HIV providers and staff in Uganda: a mixed methods, quasi-experimental controlled pilot trial.BMC Public Health. 2025 May 24;25(1):1925. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23008-4. BMC Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40413446 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Engagement With Professional Stakeholders in Healthcare Research-The Case of the Dementia PersonAlised Care Team (D-PACT) Project in the United Kingdom.Health Expect. 2024 Dec;27(6):e70133. doi: 10.1111/hex.70133. Health Expect. 2024. PMID: 39718946 Free PMC article.
-
Developing an Integrated Service Planning Tool: Lessons Learnt from Planning the WSLHD Thoracic Oncology Program.Int J Integr Care. 2025 Apr 22;25(2):2. doi: 10.5334/ijic.8976. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun. Int J Integr Care. 2025. PMID: 40292397 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Carrozza C. Democratizing expertise and environmental governance: different approaches to the politics of science and their relevance for policy analysis. J Environ Policy Plan. 2015;17(1):108‐126.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical