Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul;12(14):15358-15370.
doi: 10.1002/cam4.6087. Epub 2023 Jul 5.

Stages of change: Strategies to promote use of a Pediatric Early Warning System in resource-limited pediatric oncology centers

Affiliations

Stages of change: Strategies to promote use of a Pediatric Early Warning System in resource-limited pediatric oncology centers

Marisa Cristin Woo et al. Cancer Med. 2023 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Pediatric Early Warning Systems (PEWS) assist early detection of clinical deterioration in hospitalized children with cancer. Relevant to successful PEWS implementation, the "stages of change" model characterizes stakeholder support for PEWS based on willingness and effort to adopt the new practice.

Methods: At five resource-limited pediatric oncology centers in Latin America, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 71 hospital staff involved in PEWS implementation. Purposive sampling was used to select centers requiring variable time to complete PEWS implementation, with low-barrier centers (3-4 months) and high-barrier centers (10-11 months). Interviews were conducted in Spanish, professionally transcribed, and translated into English. Thematic content analysis explored "stage of change" with constant comparative analysis across stakeholder types and study sites.

Results: Participants identified six interventions (training, incentives, participation, evidence, persuasion, and modeling) and two policies (environmental planning and mandates) as effective strategies used by implementation leaders to promote stakeholder progression through stages of change. Key approaches involved presentation of evidence demonstrating PEWS effectiveness, persuasion and incentives addressing specific stakeholder interests, enthusiastic individuals serving as models for others, and policies enforced by hospital directors facilitating habitual PEWS use. Effective engagement targeted hospital directors during early implementation phases to provide programmatic legitimacy for clinical staff.

Conclusion: This study identifies strategies to promote adoption and maintained use of PEWS, highlighting the importance of tailoring implementation strategies to the motivations of each stakeholder type. These findings can guide efforts to implement PEWS and other evidence-based practices that improve childhood cancer outcomes in resource-limited hospitals.

Keywords: Pediatric Early Warning Systems; behavioral science; clinical cancer research; clinical management; implementation science; pediatric cancer; resource-limited; stages of change; transtheoretical model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Identified strategies mapped to stage of change. This figure describes the strategies that implementation leaders used to promote stakeholders' movement through the stages of precontemplation, contemplation, preparation, adoption, and maintenance. Stakeholders had distinct concerns in each stage. To move stakeholders from one stage to the next, implementation leaders used different collections of strategies that addressed concerns unique to each stage. Some strategies answered questions about the use of PEWS for stakeholders in every stage, while other strategies addressed stakeholder concerns relevant to only a few stages. PEWS, Pediatric Early Warning System.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agulnik A, Cárdenas A, Carrillo AK, et al. Clinical and organizational risk factors for mortality during deterioration events among pediatric oncology patients in Latin America: a multicenter prospective cohort. Cancer. 2021;127:1668‐1678. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33411 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wösten‐van Asperen RM, van Gestel JPJ, van Grotel M, et al. PICU mortality of children with cancer admitted to pediatric intensive care unit a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2019;142:153‐163. doi: 10.1016/J.CRITREVONC.2019.07.014 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brown SR, Garcia DM, Agulnik A. Scoping review of pediatric early warning systems (PEWS) in resource‐limited and humanitarian settings. Front Pediatr. 2019;6:410. doi: 10.3389/FPED.2018.00410/BIBTEX - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Agulnik A, Mora Robles LN, Forbes PW, et al. Improved outcomes after successful implementation of a pediatric early warning system (PEWS) in a resource‐limited pediatric oncology hospital. Cancer. 2017;123(15):2965‐2974. doi: 10.1002/CNCR.30664 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gillipelli SR, Kaye EC, Garza M, et al. Pediatric early warning systems (PEWS) improve provider‐family communication from the provider perspective in pediatric cancer patients experiencing clinical deterioration. Cancer Med. 2022;12:3634‐3643. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5210 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types