Cross-perspectives on care pathways for painful osteoarthritis: A qualitative analysis in patients and healthcare professionals
- PMID: 37404113
- DOI: 10.1002/msc.1795
Cross-perspectives on care pathways for painful osteoarthritis: A qualitative analysis in patients and healthcare professionals
Abstract
Purpose: To analyse and compare patients' and healthcare professionals' (HPs) perspectives concerning patient care pathways for painful osteoarthritis (OA).
Patients and methods: We performed a qualitative study of two focus groups corresponding to eight patients with painful OA and eight HPs involved in OA management.
Results: Six key themes emerged from the interviews: (1) representations of OA, (2) OA pain, (3) quality of life, (4) care pathways, (5) actors involved in the care pathway, and (6) treatments. Both groups considered general practitioners, pharmacists and physiotherapists to be first-line HPs, and no well-defined OA specialist was identified. Patients and HPs reported similar difficulties concerning the adaptation of management to individual cases, late diagnosis and treatment, whereas only patients mentioned financial issues. Communication difficulties were identified as a major problem both between patients and HPs, and between HPs. Patients reported a lack of knowledge concerning pain and OA. The coordination between the various HPs is required, with education on both pain and OA. Several possible solutions were put forward by both patients and HPs.
Conclusion: The care pathways of patients with painful OA are complex, with an unclear definition of the roles of the various HPs and suboptimal coordination. The role of HPs should be defined and collaboration between HPs developed.
Keywords: care; osteoarthritis; pain; qualitative study; quality of life.
© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Archibald, M. M., Ambagtsheer, R. C., Casey, M. G., & Lawless, M. (2019). Using zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: Perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 160940691987459. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919874596
-
- Basedow, M., & Esterman, A. (2015). Assessing appropriateness of OA care using quality indicators: A systematic review. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 21(5), 782-789. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12402
-
- Cedraschi, C., Delézay, S., Marty, M., Berenbaum, F., Bouhassira, D., Henrotin, Y., Laroche, F., & Perrot, S. (2013). Let's talk about OA pain: A qualitative analysis of the perceptions of people suffering from OA. Towards the development of a specific pain OA-related questionnaire, the OA symptom inventory scale (OASIS). PLoS One, 8(11), e79988. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079988
-
- Cheng, K. K. F., & Clark, A. M. (2017). Qualitative methods and patient-reported outcomes: Measures development and adaptation. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 160940691770298. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917702983
-
- Foster, N. E., Hartvigsen, J., & Croft, P. R. (2012). Taking responsibility for the early assessment and treatment of patients with musculoskeletal pain: A review and critical analysis. Arthritis Research and Therapy, 14(1), 205. https://doi.org/10.1186/ar3743
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
