Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023;11(6):421-428.
doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2023.68944.3253.

Closing-Wedge and Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy as Successful Treatments of ‎Symptomatic Medial Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Mohammadreza Safdari  1   2 , Ali Dastjerdi  1 , Nahid Makhmalbaf  1 , Mahshid Makhmalbaf  1 , Hadi Makhmalbaf  1
Affiliations

Closing-Wedge and Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy as Successful Treatments of ‎Symptomatic Medial Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Mohammadreza Safdari et al. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2023.

Abstract

Objectives: Closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy (CWHTO) and opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) are commonly used osteotomy techniques for the symptomatic knee osteoarthritis treatment. However, there is no consensus on which method provides superior outcomes. In this study, we compared the clinical outcomes, radiologic outcomes, and postoperative complications of these techniques.

Methods: In a randomized controlled trial, 76 patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis and associated varus ‎malalignment were randomized into the CWHTO and OWHTO groups (n=38). The primary outcome measures were knee function evaluated by Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and knee pain assessed by a visual analog scale. The secondary outcome measures were posterior tibial slope (PTS), tibial bone varus angle, and postoperative complications.

Results: Both techniques significantly improved the clinical and radiologic outcome measures. The mean improvement of total KOOS was not significantly different between the CWHTO and OPHTO groups (P=0.55). Moreover, the improvement in various KOOS subscales was not significantly different between the two groups. The mean improvement of Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was not significantly different between the CWHTO and OWHTO groups (P=0.89). The mean PTS change was not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.34). The mean improvement of the varus angle was not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.28). The rate of postoperative complications was not remarkably different between the CWHTO and OWHTO groups.

Conclusion: Considering no observed superiority of each osteotomy technique over the other one, ‎two ‎techniques could be used interchangeably and based on the surgeon's‏ preference.

Keywords: Closing-wedge; High tibial osteotomy; Opening-wedge; Osteoarthritis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the study
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Primorac D, Molnar V, Rod E, et al. Knee Osteoarthritis: A Review of Pathogenesis and State-Of-The-Art Non-Operative Therapeutic Considerations. Genes. 2020;11:8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marcovigi A, Zambianchi F, Giorgini A, Digennaro V, Catani F. The Impact of Bone Deformity on Osteoarthritic Varus Knee Correctability. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(12):2677–2684. - PubMed
    1. Liu X, Chen Z, GAO Y, Zhang J, Jin Z. High Tibial Osteotomy: Review of Techniques and Biomechanics. J Healthc Eng. 2019:2019:8363128. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ruzbarsky JJ, Dare DM, Marx RG. Closing Verses Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: an Evidence-Based Review. HSS J. 2015;11(3):291–3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mattei L, Lea S, Nicolaci G, Ferrero G, Marmotti A, Castoldi F. Closing wedge tibial osteotomy: is it an actual procedure nowadays? Ann Joint. 2017;2:6).

LinkOut - more resources